the truth

Good Game America

2009-01-22T10:59:00.000-08:00

Good game America, it was fun while it lasted. We enjoyed a marvelous period in history where freedom reigned supreme. For a brief time we prospered through the mechanisms of free market economies. We enjoyed a degree of independence from the federal government. But sadly, the brain dead, and brain washed Obama-zombies have decided to "change" all this. To adopt the extraordinarily successful systems of France, Germany, and the UK (thick sarcasm here.)

There once was a time when Americans would have been outraged at the release of its captured enemies, but today they vote for it. For a man who promised to put the rights of Americans first I find it strange how that equates to terrorist "rights." Obama has ordered that our most prominent detention center of our most dangerous enemies be closed within a year. Why, you might ask, I will tell you. He is closing it in "the name of national security and justice." That's right, you heard me right, NATIONAL SECURITY AND JUSTICE. We are going to release people that want to kill every American man, woman, and child, in the name of "national security." We are going to release these scum bags in the interest of their "rights." Since when is it "justice" to release prisoners that threaten our country? Since when do people who regret not being involved with 9/11 have rights? Since their ally and friend got into office, that's when. It makes perfect sense I suppose. Why not release the ones who have given you most of your campaign funds and support you unconditionally? You have to protect your friends in politics, that's part of the deal.

This is certainly the end of the greatest nation in the world and half of us welcome it. I hope that once this socialist utopia is achieved that people start to realize what they gave up. Unfortunately those who voted for it will never challenge it, and even if they did it will be far too late. Dick Morris, one of the most intelligent and insightful political pundints, contributors, and authors has wrote this excellent editorial. While this is a great editorial it leaves you wanting to slit your wrist, and honestly that might be the better way out considering the events to come.

The Obama presidency: Here comes Socialism

By Dick Morris

2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes. Obama will accomplish his agenda of “reform” under the rubric of “recovery.” Using the electoral mandate bestowed on a Democratic Congress by restless voters and the economic power given his administration by terrified Americans, he will change our country fundamentally in the name of lifting the depression. His stimulus packages won’t do much to shorten the downturn — although they will make it less painful — but they will do a great deal to change our nation. In implementing his agenda, Barack Obama will emulate the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Not the liberal mythology of the New Deal, but the actuality of what it accomplished.) When FDR took office, he was enormously successful in averting a total collapse of the banking system and the economy. But his New Deal measures only succeeded in lowering the unemployment rate from 23 percent in 1933, when he took office, to 13 percent in the summer of 1937. It never went lower. And his policies of over-regulation generated such business uncertainty that they triggered a second-term recession. Unemployment in 1938 rose to 17 percent and, in 1940, on the verge of the war-driven recovery, stood at 15 percent. (These data and the real story of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s missteps, uncolored by ideology, are available in The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes, copyright 2007.) But in the name of a largely unsuccessful effort to end the Depression, Roosevelt passed crucial and permanent reforms that have dominated our lives ever since, including Social Security, the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, unionization under the Wagner Act, the federal minimum wage and a host of other fundamental changes. Obama’s record will be similar, although less wise and more destructive. He will begin by passing every program for which liberals have lusted for decades, from alternative-energy sources to school renovations, infrastructure repairs and technology enhancements. These are all good programs, but they normally would be stretched out for years. But freed of any constraint on the deficit — indeed, empowered by a mandate to raise it as high as possible — Obama will do them all rather quickly. But it is not his spending that will transform our political system, it is his tax and welfare policies. In the name of short-term stimulus, he will give every American family (who makes less than $200,000) a welfare check of $1,000 euphemistically called a refundable tax credit. And he will so sharply cut taxes on the middle class and the poor that the number of Americans who pay no federal income tax will rise from the current one-third of all households to more than half. In the process, he will create a permanent electoral majority that does not pay taxes, but counts on ever-expanding welfare checks from the government. The dependency on the dole, formerly limited in pre-Clinton days to 14 million women and children on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, will now grow to a clear majority of the American population. Will he raise taxes? Why should he? With a congressional mandate to run the deficit up as high as need be, there is no reason to raise taxes now and risk aggravating the depression. Instead, Obama will follow the opposite of the Reagan strategy. Reagan cut taxes and increased the deficit so that liberals could not increase spending. Obama will raise spending and increase the deficit so that conservatives cannot cut taxes. And, when the economy is restored, he will raise taxes with impunity, since the only people who will have to pay them would be rich Republicans. In the name of stabilizing the banking system, Obama will nationalize it. Using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to write generous checks to needy financial institutions, his administration will demand preferred stock in exchange. Preferred stock gets dividends before common stockholders do. With the massive debt these companies will owe to the government, they will only be able to afford dividends for preferred stockholders — the government, not private investors. So who will buy common stock? And the government will demand that its bills be paid before any profits that might materialize are reinvested in the financial institution, so how will the value of the stocks ever grow? Devoid of private investors, these institutions will fall ever more under government control. Obama will begin the process by limiting executive compensation. Then he will urge restructuring and lowering of home mortgages in danger of default (as the feds have already done with Citibank). Then will come guidance on the loans to make and government instructions on the types of enterprises to favor. God grant that some Blagojevich type is not in charge of the program, using his power to line his pockets. The United States will find itself with an economic system comparable to that of Japan, where the all-powerful bureaucracy at MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) manages the economy, often making mistakes like giving mainframe computers priority over the development of laptops. But it is the health care system that will experience the most dramatic and traumatic of changes. The current debate between erecting a Medicare-like governmental single payer or channeling coverage through private insurance misses the essential point. Without a lot more doctors, nurses, clinics, equipment and hospital beds, health resources will be strained to the breaking point. The people and equipment that now serve 250 million Americans and largely neglect all but the emergency needs of the other 50 million will now have to serve everyone. And, as government imposes ever more Draconian price controls and income limits on doctors, the supply of practitioners and equipment will decline as the demand escalates. Price increases will be out of the question, so the government will impose health care rationing, denying the older and sicker among us the care they need and even barring them from paying for it themselves. (Rationing based on income and price will be seen as immoral.) And Obama will move to change permanently the partisan balance in America. He will move quickly to legalize all those who have been in America for five years, albeit illegally, and to smooth their paths to citizenship and voting. He will weaken border controls in an attempt to hike the Latino vote as high as he can in order to make red states like Texas into blue states like California. By the time he is finished, Latinos and African-Americans will cast a combined 30 percent of the vote. If they go by top-heavy margins for the Democrats, as they did in 2008, it will assure Democratic domination (until they move up the economic ladder and become good Republicans). And he will enact the check-off card system for determining labor union representation, repealing the secret ballot in union elections. The result will be to raise the proportion of the labor force in unions up to the high teens from the current level of about 12 percent. Finally, he will use the expansive powers of the Federal Communications Commission to impose “local” control and ownership of radio stations and to impose the “fairness doctrine” on talk radio. The effect will be to drive talk radio to the Internet, fundamentally change its economics, and retard its growth for years hence. But none of these changes will cure the depression. It will end when the private sector works through the high debt levels that triggered the collapse in the first place. And, then, the large stimulus package deficits will likely lead to rapid inflation, probably necessitating a second recession to cure it. So Obama’s name will be mud by 2012 and probably by 2010 as well. And the Republican Party will make big gains and regain much of its lost power. But it will be too late to reverse the socialism of much of the economy, the demographic change in the electorate, the rationing of health care by the government, the surge of unionization and the crippling of talk radio. Well done America, I hope you enjoy your decision. The key thing to remember from this editorial is the fact that your freedoms will be extinct in the near future. You will be bound to the federal government with no way out. Obama intends on molding Americans into pathetic, dependent drones. He doesn't have that far to go considering most already are. The only difference is that over the next four years he will make it so you HAVE to vote for him. As people are groomed to adopt Socialism and rely on there federal nanny the trap will be set. Vote for anyone else and you vote away that all important income. As a great man once said, Communism will never find its way back through the arena of ideas, but through the economic systems. I'm Drew D. and that's the truth, no matter what the Messiah has you believing.

It Would be Funny, If It Wasn't so Tragic

2009-01-20T13:27:00.001-08:00

So today marked the day where America has handed over its will to the Marxist regime. The day in which America has decided to abandon every virtue it was founded on. The day in which America has surrendered to the Socialist revolution. Yet, all the while I am being lectured to just "give him a chance." Excuse me while I vomit.

This shit I see today and have seen during the election started out as laughable but has transformed into a tragic comedy. This is the beginning of the end my friends, and it is petrifying. I know I know, stop with the drama you might say. "Your over reacting," you all say. Well I respond to these statements of ignorance by saying at least I HAVE a reaction. Just because I am not blinded by the angelic light exuded by the Messiah. Just because I do not follow lock step behind the great one as I chant his name like a zombie. So because I have a functioning brain and have not been effectively brainwashed, I am an over reacting wacko.

What really gets me about this whole thing is how the left is preaching "unity" now. How we "MUST" support the new Emperor. How we need to put "partisanship aside." How it is our "duty as Americans" to get behind our new Communist and Chief. I speak for the 50 million other real Americans who still have a functioning thought process when I say GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK! You have got to be kidding me. "Unity?" "Support?" You mean we should unite and support our new president like the Democrats did eight years ago? You mean we should "give him a chance," like the left did over the last eight years? Oh that's right, those things only apply when a licensed socialist takes the helm, I see. Time to put the "partisanship aside?" You mean like the left did as they attacked Bush every minute over the last eight years up until today at the inauguration? You mean put the partisanship aside like Palosi is as she rants about how she is going to bring the administration up on "war crimes"?

Since Michelle Obama seems to think that this country is "down right mean." Since she has such a low opinion of this country and has not been "proud to be an American until today." I wonder if she complained about all the idiots at the inauguration chanting derogatory things at Bush. Wouldn't you consider that a tad "mean" Michelle? Oh, that's right, that only applies to the right side of the aisle. My biggest question to everyone preaching "give him a chance," and "be happy for him" is WHY? Why should I be happy that we are embarking on a socialist revolution? Why should I be happy about a socialized economy? Why should I be happy about universal health care? Why should I be happy about a welfare tax plan? Why should I be happy about a weakened military, and a weakened stance on terror? Why should I be happy about a man that has the support of domestic and global terrorists? Why should I be happy about a man who advocates ideological fascism? Why should I be happy about a man who has the support of a racist, anti-American preacher? Why should I be happy about a man who intends on abandoning Israel as our long time allies? Why should I be happy about my country betraying the virtues and values of the founding fathers? Oh, that's right because he's black. So I guess blacks would turn out in brainwashed droves for Alan Keyes or Condaleeza Rice if they became president? Please. I know of people that relate to Hussein as a "celebrity" like figure. People have said they actually CRIED while watching the almighty one. I'm sorry, but I thought a president was supposed to be a president, not a rock star. This is by far the most nauseating thing of it all. Watching these blind idiots, chanting his name like Castro and Guevara, "crying" as they bathe in his angelic rays and godly words. Following him lock step, emotionally attached and intellectually impotent as he marches us off the cliff. When that happens, just remember that half of us did not vote for the "change" that is coming.

Yeah, I am thrilled, god bless the new President.

I'm Drew D. and that's the horrifying, tragic truth.

The Secret Socialist

2008-12-10T17:12:00.000-08:00

So the Socialist agenda is slowly seeping it's way through prime time television. While this is nothing new, it is more obvious than ever. Admittedly the liberal agenda has indeed thrived through the media, just a tad more covertly. The "30 days" guy is one such example, The 30 Days on Minimum Wage, 30 Days with a Gun Nut, etc. These were just poorly disguised soap boxes used to sell liberalism. Then we have others throughout cable, like "Going Tribal." A show that promotes the "environmentalist" fascist agenda. They bound around the rain forests with no shoes screaming about the "rape of the land," and the "evil Westerners." Pretty much nothing new there either.

But the newest show I have seen takes sentiments right out of the Emperor's campaign slogans. Specifically, "Spread the wealth around," and "time to pitch in." The show is called The Secret Millionaire on Fox. Basically it is a show about a millionaire that goes under cover to live in a bad area of lower income. At the end he reveals what he truly is and then gives them money to help them. I will pause for the "awww's" and weeping. To the lay man this is just a sweet little program about how nice this millionaire is. To the skeptic and intelligent eye however, I see it for what it is.

In the intro to this show they actually say " A man that decides he needs to SPREAD THE WEALTH." As you watch this obscene display of conspicuous socialist advocacy it becomes unbearable. The man and his wife go to Watts, an extremely bad neighborhood in South Central L.A. While they do show how bad it is, they high light another aspect of the neighborhood I found interesting. They show citizens in the community talking about how "good the people are here." How they all try to "help each other." Then in obvious contrast they cut to the wife of the millionaire who complains about how that "isn't like her neighborhood." The theme? To show how cold the rich neighborhoods are, and how down to earth, civil, and warm Watts is. A reasonable comparison right?

The goal of this show is to promote the idea that the rich should apologize for their success. Not only to apologize, but to be self-loathing at the same time. The goal is to make those who are well off feel like bad people if they to do not either "spread their wealth," or PROMOTE THE THEORY of re-distribution. The point of the show is say that there are others out there that "deserve" the money more than you. And that the only way to facilitate this "economic justice" is to take from those who have and give to those who don't. We in economics and on planet Earth have a word for this theory, it is called Socialism. This is just yet another example of the enemy within infiltrating America. They are and have been slowly manipulating the public through these "cute" little shows. The sad part is, the public seems too stupid to figure out what is going on. Fox really took the "spread the wealth around," comments of the Furor to heart. Maybe soon they will come out with Who Wants to be a Communist?

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Teflon Elect

2008-12-10T13:31:00.000-08:00

As many of you should already know, our new Furor (elect) seems to be carrying on the Chicago tradition. The tradition of corruption and political thuggery. This is now considered to be "accepted" by the mainstream Obamedia as simply "The Chicago Way." The more outrageous the facts get for the Furor the more they slip off him. In true Gotti fashion, and ironically in true Capone fashion, the Emperor can do no wrong. The true danger of the Teflon Elect is that no matter what happens, no matter what is proved, no matter what is said, he remains impervious and devine. Just look at the timeline and see how the facts didn't matter to the Obamedia or the "American" people.

First it was Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his "God Damn America," and "America's chickens have come home to roost," comments. Fact, Obama attended the church for twenty years. Fact, Obama contributed 24k/year to the church. Fact, this church preaches racism, anti-American rhetoric, and separatism. When asked if he (Obama) has ever witnessed such hate spouting over his twenty year tenure his response was "No." He claimed that he just used the church for his "political expediency." Even IF this was true, does it make it O.K. that he put aside any shred of decency to advance his career?

Then it was the connection between William Ayers and the Furor. Fact, Obama's political career was started in Ayers's living room. Fact, Ayers and Obama sat on the same community agitation boards in South Chicago for years. Fact, Ayers and Obama attend ceremonies in Venezuela to "honor" Hugo Chavez and applaud his radicalization of education. Fact, Obama supported a bill proposed by Ayers that promoted the radicalization of education here in the U.S. When asked about this connection Obama's response was; "He was just a guy in the neighborhood that I knew." Fact, Ayers was a leader of the domestic terrorist group "The Weather Underground," and bombed the Pentagon, Capital Building, and the NYC Police Dept. Fact, Ayers not only did not ever apologize for these actions but stated; "We didn't do enough." When asked how he (Obama) felt about these atrocities committed by this "guy he knew" he responded; "I was only eight years old at the time." Fact, he might have been eight when the bombings occurred, but he was well into his twenties and thirties while his career was launched from his living room and he worked with him on several boards.

Then there was the Tony Rezko situation. Fact, Obama considered Rezko a "friend and fundraiser." Fact, Obama was involved in a sweet heart deal with Rezko in which he purchased a piece of property for 300k below retail value. Fact, Obama and Rezko were involved in many other "shady" real estate deals throughout Chicago. Fact, Rezko was convicted of sixteen counts of corruption and bribery in 2008. When Obama was asked about these dealings with this scum bag his response was, "I worked on a real estate deal concerning the lot across the street, that's all." Fact, Obama lied point blank.

Now there is more scandal being exposed today with indictments on Illinois Governor Blagojevich. Fact, Blagojevich is on tape making deals in an attempt to auction off the empty Senate seat left by Obama. Fact, the central allegation is that the governor schemed to extort money and jobs for himself and his wife from the Obama transition team in exchange for naming Obama's preferred candidate (unnamed in the charges) to the open Senate seat. The complaint details Blagojevich's attempts to contact intermediaries to the transition, and in one case it shows him soliciting favors from a union official he identifies as an "emissary." When asked how he (Obama) felt about all of this he responded , "I had no idea what was going on." Fact, Obama was specifically mentioned on the FBI's wire taps as "that motherfucker." In the context that, Blagojevich would never just give away Obama's senate seat to whoever that "motherfucker" wanted just because he asked nicely. Meaning that he would not just give the seat away, but would most certainly sell it at the right price.

With all of these facts, and knowledge of Obama's character, does anyone seem to care? Does anyone even raise a single eye brow about these connections to criminals, domestic terrorists, and racists? Nope. It is my belief that people are so down right brainwashed that they ignore pretty much everything about our new Furor. The Obamazombies and the Obamedia refuse to report the news, and refuse to even attempt to contest the Emperor. Obama is truly the Teflon Elect, he can do no wrong and nobody cares if he does. As I have said before, the facts do not matter to the left, it is all about the agenda. The agenda that is moving forward at an incredible rate while nothing seems to stand in its way. I truly believe that as Obama takes hold as the almighty Messiah and people fall deeper into their Obacoma the country will fall. Let's hope I am wrong, but I doubt I am.

I'm Drew D. and that's the amazingling shocking truth.

Happy Tax Holidays?

2008-12-07T20:47:00.000-08:00

When I first heard Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) explain his simple yet genius alternative to the bailouts I knew that it was far too smart to ever become a reality. However, he does pose a good point, politicians rely on their constituents. I defy you to find a person (a tax paying person) with even the slightest knowledge of basic economics that would reject this idea. If people really got behind this idea, and let their representatives know, Washington would listen. Even if begrudgingly, even if they themselves didn't fully back it, re-election is their life blood.

Sadly I feel that this plan will never get off the ground. Washington invariably chooses to avoid any idea with a hint of logic or common sense. Just how logical is Gohmert's plan? In my opinion it boils down to a few simple questions. Who do you trust more with your tax dollars? The career bureaucrats in Washington, or yourself? Do you feel that Washington has exemplified fiscal responsibility over the past decade? Do you feel that the answers to our economic woes can be found in the halls of Congress? Or do you have more faith in the responsibility of the tax payers? We the people are the ones that can get this economy back on track. Giving more hand outs to failing companies and to banks that just hoard the cash doesn't seem like the best idea to me. I trust the American people far more than I trust this give away orgy that is being orchestrated by "King" Paulson. He is absolutely right when he says "let the American people decide who gets bailed out." If they choose to buy an American car with their newly freed funds, then so be it. As consumer confidence builds and spending increases economic troubles will ease. This is far cheaper than the proposed Paulson plan, not to mention a thousand times more logical. Not only is Gohmert's plan more logical than Paulson's but it is more plausible that it would be effective. Throwing money at these problems while increasing the size of an already inept government is definitely not the solution.

I trust the American tax payer to be far more responsible with the funds that are being given away. I trust that the American tax payer can stimulate the economy better than the bureaucrats can. I believe in the power of the American tax payer, and I believe in the powers of free market Capitalism. I know that if the money is put in the hands of we citizens it will produce far better results than any corporate bailout ever could.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Gestapo Training

2008-11-15T22:15:00.001-08:00

Have you all heard the news yet? To all of those "activists" roaming around college campuses stinking of bong water and patchouli who still have a man crush on our Emperor Obama, I would suggest you start paying attention to what is going on. For a group of people that absolutely despise the idea of a draft, or any sort of government mandated defense service, you sure picked a winner for President. It is called the Civil Defense Act

This whole thing sounds incredibly gestapo-Esq to me. Just pin the letters "OA" (Obama's Army) instead of "SS" on their uniforms and there you go. So we are to create a "civil" military that is "as well funded" and "as well trained" as the real military? I am normally not one for conspiracy theories but my mind has been running rampant with them lately. If you have studied Nazi Germany at all you can see the petrifying similarities between now and then. Fascism makes up the roots of liberalism, and Obama is the head of this snake. His followers march behind him lock step as if he is a super natural deity. These people literally worship the ground he walks on which will have dangerous results. Media control, and systematic brainwashing of the youth as seen here, are also scary signs. Emotion is what drives these followers, reason has been cast aside. That kind of blind faith of any leader has historically had disastrous consequences. Obama has been labeled as "extremely charismatic," and an "extraordinary speaker", so was Hitler. He has also been tagged as "highly manipulative," and "creepy." This is not me taking editorial license, these are the words of Democrats like these.

So now we have this "charismatic," "manipulative," leader who's followers march blindly in his wake driven by raw emotion. It is becoming trendy to hate the oppostion, to hate conservative ideas, hate being the key word. We have an impending censorship doctrine about to take effect that will drown out every last voice of opposition. The youth are being systematically brainwashed through our schools and "educators." We are about to have mandated "civil defense" camps used to defend the office of the President if by some chance the rest of the country starts to disagree. It fits perfectly into his grand plan. Disarm the average person in his home by eliminating the second amendment. Next, implement an armed force that will be required to fight for his cause. Leaving any remaining dissenters without any option of recourse. Is this situation starting to sound at all similar to any situation you have seen in the past? Germany, China, the Soviet Union perhaps? Just a thought.

Apparently I am not the only one who believes that there is good reason to be frightened about the appointment of our new Furor.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Can I Get Bailed Out Too?

2008-11-14T13:25:00.000-08:00

Is this the beginning of the end for the American economy and capitalism as we know it? Is it the end of true conservatism in America as we know it? Of coarse I have to think this isn't the case, but a part of me isn't so sure. We are grooming a generation of people to believe that the government should baby sit them from cradle to grave. Entitlements have taken over the American spirit and the American work ethic. Suddenly everything has become a right. When I say everything I really mean everything. It is now considered a right to own a home, a right to get a college education, a right to money that others made. This entitlement get everything for nothing mentality is only the tip of the economic ice burg.

Bailouts, am I the only one that just had a huge question mark in their head when they first heard about this policy? Bailouts? What the hell is a bailout? You live or you die in a free market economy, either way if left alone it equals prosperity. The problem is we are slowly polluting and deconstructing the free market. It first started with the housing giants Fannie and Freddy because "we had to do it." We "had" to do it because the blame was placed squarely on their shoulders. While they surely are to blame for the majority of this quandary, nobody ever thought to blame the people. Those who applied for and accepted loans knowing full well they could never pay them back.

The bailouts of AIG, Freddy and Fannie have truly opened Pandora's box. Soon after this nauseating "rescue" package was constructed everybody came running with their hand out. Every state and many cities in the union began to demand "their share" of the funds. Now this free for all bailout orgy has expanded to the auto industry. We are being told once again that we "have to" bail out these failed auto companies. Let me just stick my neck out here and say HELL NO! Where does it end, if we bail out every single institution and company that faces extinction, where do we draw the line? Fiscal responsibility is something I feel we have completely abandoned as a virtue throughout America and more importantly the government.

We can not afford this people, we truly can not. Some one, some where is going to have to pay this bill and it simply can't be done. So every time a company runs themselves into the ground through poor management and corruption we have to rescue them? This is a slippery slope that we are presented with. Once people see that being "bailed out" has become a viable option the begging will never end.

Why do think that the major proponents of this "bailout" policy are members of the loony left i.e. Palosi, Reed, etc? They advocate this for the reason that many seem to ignore. The convenient little bi-product of these government bail outs is the transfer of ownership. Once these companies accept this charity they virtually sell their souls (ownership.) For those of you who don't know, this is called socialism, the favored system of the left. The biggest condition of these bail outs is the fact that once they go through they have to do exactly what the government wants. This entire policy is so ludicrous I almost don't have words for it. So let's take institutions and companies that have been run into the ground because of the government and give them complete OWNERSHIP of them, this sounds like a good plan. These pseudo-governmental firms like Fannie and Freddy were destroyed because of left wing corruption, so now the government controls them absolutely. The auto companies are failing because of insane trade regulations and "environmentalist" bullying so now we are about to hand the reigns over to the government. This is the equivalent of making the worst employee in your business the boss of it all. Say you owned a restaurant and you had a bus boy that was absolutely awful. He slowed down the service, left the tables dirty, and was stealing from you to boot. So instead of firing him when you come across financial difficulty you decide to step down as owner and hand it all over to the bus boy to help you out of the hole.

This welfare nation that we have created is a beast that's hunger can never be satisfied. Socialism has been sold to people hook line and sinker, and it will be the end of us. Financial responsibility has been tossed out the window by everyone across the board. From the individual citizen that has to buy his own house and pay his own way through school, to the corporations that have destroyed themselves. With this abandonment of responsibility through this adoption of entitlement the American spirit is dying. Democracy will come to an end once people start to exploit the benefits sucked from the public treasury. This welfare mentality will have a snow ball effect as it did in France. People will continue to vote for the person that guarantees them more and more benefits from said treasury. As this person will more than likely be a Democrat the progression to a France like socialist nation will be inevitable.

My biggest fear is that conservatives in Washington today believe that this is the wave of the future. They will start to pander to the people by offering the very same liberal policies that we have fought so hard against. Nothing infuriates me more than seeing all of these "conservatives," crying about the election saying that we lost because we aren't liberal enough. Saying that we need to become MORE liberal in order to get elected. Are you nuts? You really believe this while you sit there and call yourself conservative? This is NOT a center-left country, it is most certainly center-right, and if you don't agree with that then please go sign your name to the Dem list. As we distinguish ourselves from the socialist left over the next four years we must go back to our conservative roots. We must re-establish our values of financial responsibility and find our own super stars that will bring the TRUE conservative message to the masses. Once people see what they really voted for and start to experience it's implications they will realize that capitalism, free markets, and essentially the conservative movement is the only answer for a prosperous country.

Let us please remember that it was "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Not , "Ask not what you can do for your country, but what your country can do for you."

Let us also remember that once you give the government the power to give you everything, you give it the power to take everything away.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Obamageddon

2008-11-06T14:31:00.001-08:00

All hail, All hail, bow to the Emperor lest you be punished. Get ready America, the Messiah has taken his throne and his minions are in place. As I said before the election, people are too stupid to realize what they just voted for. In some sick way I am happy and look forward to the years to come. America wanted Socialism, so let them experience Socialism. They wanted a friend of the enemy in the White House, so let them see the result. Unfortunately Americans' often need to learn the hard way that they made a mistake. Let's just hope that the damage done can in some way be reversed.

Why did America choose to blindly follow this man and his party off the cliff? How could America be so ignorant you might ask? It was a simple decision made by simple people. In the minds of the voters the decision panned out like this; Times are bad, Republicans in Congress, Republican President, they are to blame, time to switch teams, they will produce the "change." As ill-conceived this logic may be, despite how down right dangerous it is, it is how they think. Well, you will absolutely get the "change" America, no doubt about it.

Who's to blame for this horrible turn of events you might ask? That's easy, it is the fault of the Republicans and a horrible Republican candidate. If there is one good thing that has come out of this tragedy that is Obama it is the fact that Republicans are forced to re-group. This is the wake up call to all those pathetic excuses for conservatives in Washington. If Republicans actually ACTED like Republicans during the last eight years we might have stood a chance. We spent like liberals and dragged our feet like liberals, so how can we expect Americans' to distinguish us from the left? It is time for the Washington right to go back to their roots of conservatism. It is time to show the stark contrast between capitalists and socialists. It is a shame that we had to be backed into a corner to realize just how far we have strayed from our principles. It is even more sad that we will HAVE to fight socialism as it will be forced upon us every day for the next four years. Thank god it isn't a filibuster proof congress, so we might be able to get in their way enough to slow them down.

If we make it to the next election, I am optimistic. America will see exactly what the Democrats are, and more importantly what Obama is. He will not be able to win re-election using the same moronic strategies and catch phrases he did this time. No more "change" signs will be waving, no "yes we can" crap. He won't be a change and everyone will have already seen what "they can" do. The Bush card has been played to extinction, so there goes a golden key for the Democrats. They can't blame every last thing on the Republicans because there aren't any. All the blame rests on their shoulders. America will finally come down off their Obama high and realize that the miracles they were promised weren't delivered. During the next four years it is the Republicans opportunity to show the country just what conservatism is and is not.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Vote Obama........Or Else

2008-11-01T19:42:00.000-07:00

O.K. folks, let me lay it out for all of you who are just overwhelmed with this election mumbo jumbo. What we are being told by the left and the rest of the Communist wing of America is that if we don't bow down and let Obama waltz into the White House that there will be hell to pay. In other words, it's an attempt to extort the nation. No greater example of liberal thuggery if there ever was one.

The point is, if you DON'T stand down America, and you get in the chosen one's way, it will be your ass. Just shut up and take it, we know what's best for you, is the message from the left. How dare you challenge the Messiah Joe the Plumber? How dare ANYONE challenge the great one? Coming from a group of people that insist on calling the right a bunch of fascists, this seems to be a tad hypocritical. In fact, this entire Communist campaign for Obama defines fascism. Dominating the media, destroying decenters, and coercing the public, yeah, sounds pretty synonymous with the "F" word to me. Hitler came to power the exact same way Obama will. In fact Hitler, Obama, and the entire leftist party are quite similar. All represent the Socialist party, all promote ideological fascism, and both came to power through media domination and propaganda machines. Crazy statement? Too bad, I haven't been silenced, YET. I say yet, because the fascism of Obama is soon to come. Just wait until the "Fairness Doctrine" gets through. In which talk radio is silenced, Fox News is shut down, and every avenue of descent is successfully squashed. We can't have people speaking out against the Emperor now can we?

The biggest hypocrisy of this entire campaign is based on something you all might have been hearing a lot about lately, race. Using the "racist" tactic is a very old trick of the left. They use this in defence of virtually every issue that has legitimate opposition. Opposing anything from immigration policy to affirmative action will automatically brand you as a racist. However, not supporting Obama is the most popular reason for them to give you this label. If you question the fact that this guy is the most dangerous, inexperienced, Communist wacko ever, your just a racist. Let me tell you who is racist, black people. Before you all flip out hear me out. 96% of all blacks are voting for Obama, I'm sure their love for his policies are their only motivation. Do you think if 96% of white people were voting for McCain that they all wouldn't be labeled redneck racists? Do you think that if all whites threatened to riot if McCain didn't get elected there wouldn't be public outrage? My assertion that blacks are far more racist than whites is not justified by simply this fact. I constantly hear black people refer to whites as "that white girl," or, "that white dude." So your saying if I walk around saying "black girl" this and "black guy" that, that nobody would say anything? If I gave a white man a job over a black man even though the black man was far more qualified I would be racist. But if I give the far less qualified black man a job over the white man, I'm a tolerant, open-minded liberal. You can't find me one black comedian that can do a set without at least one white joke. All too many base their entire show on a black/white comparison. So if a white comedian was up there making fun of black people nobody would say anything? I hear more hateful remarks about white people than I do anything else, but that's considered "humorous." Racism is wrong no matter what color the person is who espouses it. Obama is the biggest supporter of playing the race card. He can't go one second without "reminding" us that he is black. This coming from a man who is the most racist of all. "White mans greed runs a world in need," I believe the quote is. His wife is an overtly racist separatist as well, if you read her college thesis you will understand.

So make sure you Vote Obama, because if you don't blacks will riot. Just obey, and accept the change that we all need so badly.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth, and I guess I can now be called racist.

Liberals DO Hate America

2008-10-22T12:17:00.000-07:00

Unlike Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C) I do NOT apologize for saying what he has already said. He is now trying to back track and say "he didn't mean it that way." Well I DO mean it that way, because it is a fact. Anyone with a sliver of brain power should recognize that liberals not only hate America, but brag about it. Hating this country is one of their party platforms for god sake. Their hatred is what fuels their sick, twisted, and treasonous ideologies. Wrong you say? Crazy am I? Well let's take a peak at what the Emperor has to say on the subject shall we?

From Sunday's televised "Meet the Press" Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. General Bill Ginn USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. The General also stated to the Senator that according to the United States Code Title 36, Ch. 10, Sec. 171....During rendition of the National Anthem when the flag is displayed all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. At the very least, "Stand and Face It."

Senator Obama Live on Sunday states: "As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said. "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American Flag is a symbol of OPPRESSION."

"And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing. If that were our anthem, then I might salute it."

"My wife disrespects the flag for many personal reasons. Together she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past, many years ago."

Wow, is all I have to say, for once I might be speechless, but not quite. Yes, Lord Obama I understand how wearing that flag pin could lead people to believe your "TAKING SIDES." God forbid, I for one would never want other countries to think that our PRESIDENT is taking OUR side. To WHOM is the flag considered a "symbol of oppression." Oh, that's right, the same people that live in caves and have your picture on their walls.

This is just the beginning ladies and gentlemen, if you think this is bad wait until he's elected. He will change the Pledge of Allegiance, change the Flag, change the National Anthem. Change it all to re-build it in his own "glorious" image. Maybe something like THIS or THIS would be more appropriate for a National Anthem. Laugh now perhaps, but see who's crying in a few months.

I'm Drew D. and that's the HORRIBLE, SCARY, AND INFURIATING truth.

The Third Party

2008-10-18T22:19:00.000-07:00

What a Libertarian Is - and Is Not
by Sam Wells

A libertarian is a person - any person - who consistently advocates individual freedom and consistently opposes the initiation of the use of coercion by anyone upon the person or property of anyone else for any reason. (Coercion is here defined as any action taken by a human being against the will or without the permission of another human being with respect to his or her body or property. This includes murder, rape, kidnapping, assault, trespassing, burglary, robbery, arson and fraud.) Some libertarians (such as the late Robert LeFevre) not only oppose all forms of initiatory coercion, but also the use of retaliatory coercion (revenge or criminal justice). The vast majority of libertarians, however, maintain that physical force used in self-defense or defense of one's family or property is fully justifiable.

But, all libertarians, by definition, at least oppose the initiatory use of coercion. They support the rational principle of the individual human rights of life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. This means that each individual has the right to keep what he earns for himself and his family, and this includes the right to use, trade, sell, give away, or dispose of his property as he sees fit. A person who violates the rights of others by initiating coercion, violence, or fraud against them forfeits his right to be left alone by government and may be arrested, charged, tried, and imprisoned, deported or executed if convicted (depending on the nature of his or her crimes). The basic, proper function of lawful government is therefore limited to protecting these rights of the peaceful individual from criminals and foreign aggression, and in not violating these rights itself, for if government is allowed to go beyond this legitimate function and itself initiates force in violation of the rights of peaceful citizens, it necessarily contradicts the only rational justification for its own existence by acting criminally itself.

Real libertarians take individual rights seriously - seriously enough to consistently uphold them against the initiation of the use of force by anyone (including government) for any reason. This means that government must be bound by the policy of "laissez faire" - which means that government has no business coercively interfering with the lives of peaceful (non-coercive) citizens in their private affairs and voluntary (market) relationships.

Libertarians may or may not approve of some of the things that some people may do in private or in voluntary relations, but whatever their own code of personal moral conduct is, they do not seek to ban any private or voluntary activities by the use of force, including the force of government action. To do so would be to violate the very principle of individual rights of person and property, and thereby undercut any rational argument in favor of freedom or defense of the free-market system. Those exception makers and outright coercive busy-bodies in our midst (referred to as "interventionists" or "statists" by libertarians) who do want to abandon government by principle and instead put Whim in charge of the use of legal coercion are the people who help set the stage for arbitrary and capricious governmental tyranny - leading in the direction of totalitarian dictatorship.

Libertarians Are Not Conservatives

Libertarians are not "conservatives"; libertarians are radicals (principled advocates) for individual freedom and responsibility - and the pure free-market private-enterprise economic system which would result from a consistent application of that principle. A "conservative" on the other hand is one who wishes to preserve the status quo. The status quo in America today is the semi-socialist, semi-fascist mixed-economy welfare-state - a system inimical to personal freedom and responsibility. Libertarians do not support such a system, and oppose any and all measures to expand it while favoring the total repeal of interventionist laws and regulatory agencies.

Conservatives of the William F. Buckley or William Bennett variety are generally more concerned with imposing "order" than with allowing freedom. Although they often (and rightly) complain that government has got "too big" and too meddlesome in our lives, on some specific issues they themselves favor using the political power of government to legislate and enforce their view of morality upon the populace in "the national interest" or for the "social good." William Bennett, for example, opposes the legalization and/or decriminalization of the sale and use of heroin and cocaine, and he continues to support the no-win "War on Drugs" which is causing violence to escalate in our society. Libertarians, on the other hand, realize that "enforced morality" (in such personal matters) is a contradiction in terms; without freedom of choice there can be no moral responsibility and personal growth.

Libertarians also perceive that freedom brings about a more complex, dynamic and harmonious order in society (co-ordinated by the market price mechanism) than any static view of order imposed by central political planning and regulations of our non-coercive behaviors.
Libertarians are for individual freedom - and this includes the freedom of people to do some things that we and other people may disapprove of. A person should be free (from coercive interference) to do what he pleases with his own life and property, as long as he does not violate (through coercive interference) the same right of other peaceful persons to do what they want with their lives and properties. (The second clause is logically implied in the first.) Libertarians do not oppose non-coercive persuasion, educational efforts, private advertising campaigns, organized boycotts, or even social ostracism as means of trying to effect changes in the private behavior of others. (Many people have stopped smoking tobacco in recent years partly as a result of education and persuasion by friends and family members.) What libertarians do oppose is the attempt by anyone (individuals or government officials) to impose their own views of "fairness" or personal morality on others through the initiation of the use of coercion, by either personal violence or political legislation and governmental action. This principled position sets libertarians apart from conservatives as well as other non-libertarians.

Libertarians Are Not Welfare-State "Liberals"
Libertarians are not to be confused with the so-called "civil libertarians" which typify the membership and leadership of the American Civil Liberties Union. It is true that the ACLU has come to the defense of freedom of speech for certain minorities (e.g., nazis, communists, and anarchists) and this is commendable - but the podium has often been at taxpayers' expense, which is a "no-no" from the real libertarian perspective. Many "civil libertarians" believe that some people have a "right" to violate the rights of others; they claim there is a "right to a job" or a "right" to welfare payments or a "right" to "free education" or a "right" to free child care - all at the expense of the people (usually the taxpayers) who are forced to pay for these so-called "rights." Real libertarians are for true freedom, not "freedom" at the forced expense of others. The only obligation that true rights impose on persons is of a negative kind: not to interfere with the rights of other people - i.e., to refrain from the initiation of the use of coercion. This is the core principle of libertarianism and is sometimes called the 'Non-Aggression Axiom'.

Welfare-state "liberals" and "civil libertarians" speak of "rights" of people as members of specially privileged groups, such as "women's rights" or "gay rights" or "rights of the handicapped" or even so-called "animal rights"! Real libertarians know that there are only individual rights, not group rights. There is no such thing as "gay rights" or "black rights" or "white rights" or left-handed Martian rights. Government must not be used to dish out special privileges to any group for any reason, since government cannot give anyone anything unless it takes it away from others by force, thereby violating their rights. There can be no such thing as a "right" to violate the rights of others.
No doubt there are some well-intentioned ACLU members who do promote true civil liberties and uphold human rights; however, the ACLU has not come to the defense of the rights of school children whose freedom is being violated daily by compulsory attendance laws and the tyranny of Federally-ordered forced busing. Nor do I know of any case in which the ACLU has defended the constitutional rights of businessmen who are being harassed by OSHA agents and other bureaucrats, or hounded by such arbitrary and subjective laws as the antitrust acts. Indeed, many "civil libertarians" seem callously insensitive to the victims of crime and legal plunder - while they defend known criminals from justice.

Because of their consistent adherence to the principle of individual rights, libertarians are the only true defenders of liberty -- civil or otherwise. Real libertarians understand that freedom of speech and other civil liberties depend on the sanctity of private property - not its violation by anti-discrimination laws and other forms of government intervention.

Libertarians Are Not for Unlimited Majority Rule

Libertarians are not democrats. While majority rule may or may not be as good as any other mechanism for selecting the men and women who administer the offices of government, libertarians deny that anyone or any group has a right to rule over other peaceful (non-coercive) citizens - whether they are in the majority or minority at any given time. If stealing is wrong for an individual to do, it is still wrong when conducted by a large group or by a majority vote. The number of people involved in an act does not change the rightness or wrongness of the act. There is no magic number that turns an individual wrong into a collective right. In a libertarian republic, the basic policy of government (i.e., laissez faire) is set by reference to fundamental principle -- the principle of individual rights -- and not determined by a show of hands. Libertarians uphold the right of the peaceful individual to self-ownership and private property against any who would violate this right - even a majority.
Libertarians Are Not Anarchists

Libertarians are not anarchists.

While it is true that some individuals favor a political system of competing vigilante committees, and refer to this position as "anarcho-capitalism" (a view formerly held by libertarian economist Murray Rothbard), this is a confusing misnomer based on an apparent failure to clearly distinguish between the nature of market institutions (which do not involve the use of coercion at all, either initiatory or retaliatory) and the nature of coercive entities (criminal or legal). Actually, libertarianism rests on the concepts of individualism, self-ownership, private property, & voluntary (market) exchange. Classical anarchism not only opposed the political state, but also some voluntary organizations of which it disapproved. Most importantly, true anarchists opposed private property - without which no voluntary relationships are possible. Today's libertarians are in the classical liberal tradition of Algernon Sidney, John Locke, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Edmund Burke, Herbert Spencer, and Frederic Bastiat - not the anarchist tradition of Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.

Libertarians Are Not Pragmatists

Libertarians do not advocate freedom or the free-market economy merely because "it works" (which it does better than any other system); they support it as the only non-coercive and just system - the system in which people are free to deal with one another on a voluntary basis as traders (exchangers of goods and services) instead of as masters and slaves - or as privileged class and exploited host. Others advocate government by whim. Libertarians adhere to certain principles, and without the guidance of principles and standards, all that is left is pragmatic expediency and the tyranny of government by whim. One might say that libertarians are "idealists" in the popular sense of that word; after all, libertarians stand for certain ideals - goals to strive for (e.g., less government intervention, more individual freedom and moral responsibility, free markets, etc.). Because libertarianism is based on man's nature and the nature of reality, it is the most practicable social system.

Libertarians are practical idealists.

Now you tell me, do you think that this party should have a legitimate role in American politics? I believe that as the two major parties become more and more synonymous Americans will look toward alternatives. I don't consider the "Green" Party a viable alternative, for the record. That is just a party that doesn't think the left is left enough. You might say in response to this that Libertarians are right of right. While this is true to a limited extent, they do not share many conservative policies. The Libertarian Party is quite unique and deserves serious consideration. After America falls into a quasi-Cuba with Emperor Obama at the helm, eyes will open, I hope.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The RED white and blue

2008-10-16T18:11:00.000-07:00

Could it be that more than half of Americans actually support the impending socialization of our nation? Could they really be ASKING for this great nation to go the way of the Soviet Union? Considering what I have seen and heard throughout this election period I would lean toward the affirmative. However my heart still tells me that once the wool is pulled from their feeble eyes they won't be so receptive.

Never before have I seen the Communist agenda be so widely accepted and promoted in America. We all knew that this philosophy is the love child of the liberals but it has recently run rampant. Not only is their Presidential candidate (soon to be Emperor) the supreme leader of the Red party, but it is considered a political PLUS to be so. As much as Hussein lies and manipulates the American people about his true intentions he is still quite forthcoming. That is the truly scary thing about all of this. The fact that he is BRAGGING about changing the fabric of this nation in order to liken it to Cuba is shocking. What is even more shocking is the fact that people seem to love this idea. Am I lost? Where in the hell am I? Seriously, I really thought I lived in America, but lately it feels like I am living in the middle of 19th century USSR.

Barry and Biden have promoted the Communist agenda from day one and their numbers just get better and better. EVERYTHING they stand for and wish to implement reeks of collectivism. From stating that taxes are "patriotic," to saying "we need to spread your wealth around." Crazy, you might be saying to yourself. I'm just a crazy right wing radical nut right? No way is Barry Hussein in any way connected to the Communist Party right? Well let's see, take a gander at some of what these people had to say.

“Of course, as we all know, Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist and he had a very good understanding of the underlying source of problems which all too often goes unstated and unchallenged and remains hidden because of the high fear-factor level in this country; I am referring to capitalism―a thoroughly rotten system. Frank Marshall Davis also understood through his thorough studies of the situation that socialism provided the only workable alternative to capitalism.”

Just add Davis to the long list of all-star mentors of Barry Hussein. It doesn't end their, hear is another sparkling Osama recommendation.

"Notably, the labor movement has stepped up its independent mobilization for this election. It is leading an unprecedented campaign to educate and unify its ranks to elect the nation’s first African American president. Last week, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka told the Steelworkers convention that there is “no evil that’s inflicted more pain and more suffering than racism — and it’s something we in the labor movement have a special responsibility to challenge.”
If Obama’s candidacy represented nothing more than the spark for this profound initiative to unite the working class and defeat the pernicious influence of racism, it would be a transformative candidacy that would advance progressive politics for the long term.
The struggle to defeat the ultra-right and turn our country on a positive path will not end with Obama’s election. But that step will shift the ground for successful struggles going forward.
One thing is clear. None of the people’s struggles — from peace to universal health care to an economy that puts Main Street before Wall Street — will advance if McCain wins in November.
Let’s keep our eyes on the prize.
That’s right. The Communist Party Of The United States wants to elect Barack Hussein Obama as our President"

Makes you want to go pull that blue (RED) lever doesn't it? How inspiring, I can hardly contain myself. Is Barry a Communist? Well is the sky blue, is water wet, is beer delicious? Of coarse. Individual psychos like the previous gem I quoted are not the only Red supporters of Barry. Everyone from Fidel Castro to Hugo Chavez are on the Barry bandwagon. Not to mention every radical Islamic faction across the world having his picture on their cave walls. With all this support why shouldn't we vote for him?

Hussein is finally calling his "tax plan" for what it is, Communism. Just HERE, he decided to explain to this man that "spreading the wealth around is good for everyone." Hmm, so it's "NOT" punishing your success if the government takes away 75% of your money for doing so? Geez, I wonder what he DOES think punishment is. Oh wait, I know, punishment is making those who do nothing, produce nothing, and contribute nothing, HAVE NOTHING. Sorry sir, your much to "rich," you have plenty, it's time to be "patriotic." Which means I'm robbing you, but you should feel good about it. I will put it where it "belongs." Great plan Mr. Messiah, you should advise Castro when your not busy taking over America.

How full of shit is Barry Hussein really. This guy would lie about what he had for breakfast. Saying that he is "worried about factory jobs going over seas." COME ON! Gee, I wonder WHY jobs are going over seas and will continue at record breaking rates once his slimy ass gets in. It's because, Mr. Emperor, when you TAX THE HELL out of those "evil corporations" you speak of and FORCE them to conform to every regulation under the sun, they LEAVE. They either leave, or they lay off thousands, both of which are super things to happen in an ailing economy.

However, through all this gloom and doom there is a shimmer of hope. Hope that lies in a man named "Joe the Plumber." Here is a regular guy, a man that is trying to pursue the American dream. A man that has worked 12 hrs. a day, seven days a week for years in the hopes of buying the business he works for. To provide a better life for his family, to aspire to achieve things his parents could only dream of. But does Barry think he should have his dream? Sure, after he pays his dues to everyone down the street. Like the people that don't work, don't pay taxes, and don't produce anything, sounds reasonable. I love Joe, he should run for office, finally a man who speaks for me. He is PROUD of this country and tired of the leftist "apologize for America" BS. He is tired of Socialist programs like Social Security and Barry's proposed Sick Care. He recognizes that this re-distribution of wealth plan is a slippery slope. EXACTLY JOE! Just wait until Barry decides that 100k/year is "rich enough." Or even 40k, or how about just above the poverty line? That would be "good for everyone" don't you think? And it's not like Hussein wants taxes to go towards National Security, or Public Works (REAL public works, like roads not ACORN.) He wants taxes to go from the pockets of those who earned it to those who didn't. Take it from those who create jobs, create prosperity, contribute to society and the economy, and put into those who don't even PAY taxes. The goal is to make everyone the same, the Communist goal. Everyone makes the same, and everyone lives the same, inspiring philosophy isn't it?

We can only hope that the true Americans in this country stand up and fight this impending Communist Revolution before it's too late.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Employee Coercion Act

2008-10-13T16:59:00.001-07:00

The cleverly named "Employee Free Choice Act" will be one of the great "changes" to the workforce that the Messiah will implement once he has taken his thrown. This beautiful little bill not only strips an employees rights, but it makes them a target. The primary goal of this act is to convert the secret-ballot method of voting for and organizing unions to a public "card check" method. This method would mean doing away with the anonymity of union voting and replacing it with signed cards that are publicly viewed. Please read the act carefully as it is well outlined in the Heritage Foundation article.This part is key:

To protect American workers, Congress should:

Protect workers' privacy during organizing drives and guarantee every worker the right to vote in a private-ballot election;

Ensure that workers hear from both sides during an organizing drive and have time to reflect on their choice so they can make an informed and considered decision; and

Protect the right of workers and employers to bargain collectively without having government officials unilaterally impose employment contracts on them.

The Employee Free Choice Act would strip workers of their fundamental rights and leave them more vulnerable to pressure than before.

This is absolutely correct and should be highlighted. Ask yourself; Why would unions be so adamant about making the votes of employees public? For a variety of reasons, one, it allows them to target those who have voted against it, and two, hinders employees from voting their true opinion. It is a fact that without privacy and outside influence a person will often vote ingenuously. And why not, with severe intimidation and threats resulting from a "no" vote on unions you might do the same. Union thuggery is no secret to anyone with half a brain (liberals excluded of coarse). With these public ballots they can target a dissenter within the employee ranks and proceed with the coercion, or, "persuasion." They will harass, intimidate, even go to the persons home in order to help them "see the light."

This is just one of the initial steps in implementing the Emperors second coming of the Workers Revolution. There will be more sure to come, so stay tuned for more exciting developments in the Messiah's war on capitalism!

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Obama Loves Kids

2008-10-09T16:25:00.000-07:00

We all know that the Messiah is truly a man of the people. A champion of the working man, a true humanitarian. Well as long as you don't consider a new born infant a "human" I guess that's true. For those of you who don't know infanticide is the practice of killing a child that was "supposed" to have been previously aborted. In other words if the abortion is botched and god forbid the baby is born anyway, the hospital "finishes the job," so to speak. Hear the horrifying details and eye witness testimony from a nurse that worked at one of these hospitals.

This is just more confirmation that these people are absolutely sick and need to be stopped at all costs. There is zero difference between Emperor Obama and Kim Jong Il in terms of "birth control" policies. Both are clear cut murderers and mad men. The most disturbing part about the whole thing was the crowd that cheered and applauded as Obama spoke to the masses at Unplanned Parenthood. What more evidence do we need to prove just how twisted and deranged the left is? How people can stand by and APPLAUD the murdering of new borns is totally beyond me. It should have come as no surprise to me, considering this is a man that believes a child is a "punishment" in the first place. I just thought that anyone with a slice of soul in their body that hasn't been dissolved by liberalism might just have a SLIGHT problem with infanticide. I guess I over estimated them, again, not surprised.

Sadly ironic considering Obama and his ilk will be the first to call our fine troops "baby killers."

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Speech Every American Should Hear

2008-10-07T01:05:00.000-07:00

(click here to listen)

Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. You won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. Men, all this stuff you've heard about America not wanting to fight, wanting to stay out of the war, is a lot of horse dung. Americans traditionally love to fight. All real Americans, love the sting of battle. When you were kids, you all admired the champion marble shooter, the fastest runner, the big league ball players, the toughest boxers ... Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in Hell for a man who lost and laughed.

That's why Americans have never lost and will never lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans. Now, an army is a team. It lives, eats, sleeps, fights as a team. This individuality stuff is a bunch of crap. The Bilious bastards who wrote that stuff about individuality for the Saturday Evening Post, don't know anything more about real battle than they do about fornicating. Now we have the finest food and equipment, the best spirit, and the best men in the world. You know ... My God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're going up against. My God, I do. We're not just going to shoot the bastards, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun bastards by the bushel.

Now some of you boys, I know, are wondering whether or not you'll chicken out under fire. Don't worry about it. I can assure you that you'll all do your duty. The Nazis are the enemy. Wade into them. Spill their blood, shoot them in the belly. When you put your hand into a bunch of goo, that a moment before was your best friends face, you'll know what to do. Now there's another thing I want you to remember. I don't want to get any messages saying that we are holding our position. We're not holding anything, we'll let the Hun do that. We are advancing constantly, and we're not interested in holding onto anything except the enemy. We're going to hold onto him by the nose, and we're going to kick him in the ass. We're going to kick the hell out of him all the time, and we're going to go through him like crap through a goose.

Now, there's one thing that you men will be able to say when you get back home, and you may thank God for it. Thirty years from now when you're sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee, and he asks you, What did you do in the great World War Two? You won't have to say, Well, I shoveled shit in Louisiana. Alright now, you sons of bitches, you know how I feel. I will be proud to lead you wonderful guys into battle anytime, anywhere. That's all.

General George S. Patton, Jr.
3rd Army Speech - England.
31 MAY 1944 - 6th Armored Division

One of the greatest men in history, and one of the best speeches ever delivered. All too many Americans have forgotten the values that this country was built on. More importantly we have lost sight of the very values that men like Patton defended with honor and pride. The values that embody the spirit of America that seems to be fleeting day by day. If Patton ever heard the leftist drivel of today he would spin in his grave. Now more than ever every American needs to be reminded of what we ONCE stood for.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

An American Miracle

2008-10-03T17:45:00.000-07:00

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a......CONSERVATIVE Hollywood Film??? I never thought I would see the day that a movie with conservative leanings would EVER be given the green light in Hollywood. The new movie, An American Carol not only got the green light but is actually getting advertising time. Actors including Kevin Farley, Jon Voight, Kelsey Grammar, Dennis Hopper, Leslie Nielson and even Bill O'Reilly take the task of exposing the radical Hollywood left for the wackos they are. I personally can't wait to see this film, and I really can't wait for Michael Moore and Rosey O'Donnel to see it. How do you think the fair and balanced critics will view this movie? I'm already laughing.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Woman That Can Do No Right

2008-10-03T13:58:00.000-07:00

After last nights debate it was quite obvious that Sarah Palin is more than qualified to be the VP of the United States. In fact, she is more qualified than the great Obama to be President. However, the ObamaMania media didn't quite see it that way, what a shocker. They accused her of doing everything from making a "prepared speech," to not "having enough facts." I'm sorry, I suppose we were watching different debates. The debate I saw showed me a confident, well informed, and quite humorous Palin. If anyone sounded like they were giving prepared mini-speeches it was clearly (Say it ain't so) Joe Biden. Palin got the better of Joe Biden on more than one occasion, I know it, and Biden knows it.

The standards for the ObamaMania media in terms of determining Biden's "victory" have become lower and lower. They had to be low in order to blind themselves to Palin's performance. With all their heart they prayed for Palin's destruction at the podium. They hoped to see the "bumpkin" Palin make a fool of her self as she clung to her guns and religion. When Palin went on to be nothing short of impressive it infuriated and boggled the leftist Nazi's. You could visibly see the likes of Chris Mathews and others scramble for any negative comment they could pin to Palin. Their plan of attack? To say Biden won because he had a "harder job" to do than Palin did. According to these slow witted libs they thought that Biden had to prove he was qualified to be President, and all Palin had to do was "show a pulse." Umm, last I checked it was the Obamedia that said Palin wasn't a good VP pick because she would LIKELY have to be President one day. Not only that, Palin had to do much more than "show a pulse." She had the ridiculous task of cancelling out the horrendous characterizations of her in the past weeks. A task which she took on and made easy work of.

In other words the litmus test for determining the winner of the past two debates is as follows: In debate #1 it was deemed a "tie", therefore Obama wins. In debate #2 Palin won, so it was deemed another "tie," so guess who wins, Biden. Anyone see a theme here? It seems that no matter what anyone on the Mccain/Palin ticket does it's a lost cause. Sarah Palin could cure cancer, achieve world peace, pave the roads with gold and still be crucified by the left for being a hunter.

The Meatballs that Mccain/Palin watched Float over the Plate:

While Mccain's first performance was satisfactory and Palin's quite impressed me I have my complaints. Mccain passed up a serious opportunity to illustrate to the American people the connection between the Democrats and the financial crisis. He also passed up the chance to call out Obama on any of the thousand lies that were said. Like making a reference to Harry Reid's "The war is lost, the surge has failed" comment when Obama claimed "Nobody is saying the war is lost." Or by calling Obama on the fact that he has NEVER advocated oil drilling like he said he does in the debate.

However Palin missed the biggest opportunity of all. Biden had the audacity to claim that Bush's policies have been an unmitigated failure. That we are far worse off after eight years of his "dangerous" world view. BS! Palin should have proclaimed (maybe not in those words) but along those lines. A FAILURE MR. Biden? Really? Preventing one SINGLE attack since 2001 from happening when it was almost inevitable is not what I would call a failure. Those "failed polices" are what kept your miserable ass safe for the last seven years Mr. Biden.

She also should have addressed the Socialist attacks on Capitalism by Obama/Biden. When Obama/Biden said "the fundamentals of our economy are NOT sound." that they are "what got us in this mess." Mccain or Palin should have again cried BS! "Fundamentals not sound?" Really Mr. Messiah? Really Mr. Biden? The market was up and running 48 hrs after 9/11, when the economy should have and WOULD have tanked in any other country ours was resilient. And WHY was it resilient? Because the FUNDAMENTALS ARE SOUND YOU LIBERAL PEE BRAINS!

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Go Bill Go !!

2008-10-02T22:44:00.000-07:00

I have not been the biggest Bill O'Reilly fan in the past but he has gotten back into my good graces. I respect Bill O'Reilly, he is a good radio host and an excellent writer. However, I have gotten a little tired of his "centrist," "play both sides" method of presenting the news. At times he struck me as just too moderate for my liking. But today on The Factor he was a credit to the sentiments of not only conservatives but all Americans.

Finally somewhat let that schmuck Frank have it. Finally someone called him on his key role in this disaster, and it being on national TV was just icing on the cake. I love it when O'Reilly takes off that "moderate" mask and gets mad like the rest of us. That little weasel Frank tried and tried to pin this on everyone else under the sun and evade ANY sort of responsibility and Bill called him on it. Frank's response was of typical liberal fashion. Blame the Republicans, blame Bush, blame ANYONE but themselves. There is nothing more obvious than Frank's guilt in this situation but will we hear that on MSLSD? I think not, instead you'll hear about the big bad Republicans causing it all. Despite the fact that this makes zero sense and has zero truth to it, Americans seem to eat it up. All I can say right now is Way to Go Bill !

I'm Drew. D. and that's the truth.

Why We Will Lose The Election and the Country

2008-10-01T19:37:00.000-07:00

The old saying, "Nice Guys Finish Last," will embody the 2008 election. John Mccain being the "nice guy," has chosen to take the higher ground in an attempt to show us all that you can in fact become President being a stand up guy. While I fully respect his desire to bring honor and dignity to American politics I feel that the Chicago thug politics of Obama will unfortunately win out. Obama has zero dignity and zero honor, nothing is beneath this man or the Democratic party. Lying cheating and stealing are just the means that justify their ends.

The only way Democrats can ever win anything is by either cheating, lying or a combination of both. They know they can't run on facts because the truth contradicts everything they stand for. Obama does not stray from these practices. ACORN (The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is a "non-partisan" organization that promotes community agitation across the country. Did I say "non-partisan"? What I mean by non-partisan is that they are left wing wackos. That being said it came as no surprise to me that they are being accused of voter fraud in just about every swing state. I really admire their zeal, not caring whether or not someone is alive or dead or whether they exist at all in order to get registrations, that's true dedication to their job. It doesn't stop there, fraud fuels the Democrat machine. There is malpractice everywhere from ACORN's bogus voter registrations to Obama's "questionable" accounting practices.

These are just a few of the fraudulent cases that we know about. Just imagine how widespread this criminal empire that is the liberal machine actually is. If Mccain wants to win he is going to have to start defending himself. He is going to have to stop with all this "bi-partisan BS" and understand that Obama is the OPPONENT. When Obama rings off lie after lie after lie Mccain needs to be there to expose it, but he isn't. There were distinct bold faced lies littered throughout the first debate and Mccain passed on the meatballs. When Obama said "Nobody is saying the war is lost." Mccain should have said "BS! You DID!" When Obama said he is FOR drilling" Mccain should have said "BS! You AREN'T!" Instead Mccain stood there, and spoke about ear marks, trying to take that "high road" I suppose. I'm sorry but that won't work here Mr. Senator, I really wish it would, but it won't.

The main reason we will lose in November is because the American people seem to want this "change" Lord Obama preaches about. Apparently they are so dim witted to think that Bush is solely responsible for this current economic crisis. They seem to embrace this Socialist revolution that we face. They like the idea of universal mediocrity and misery. Perhaps are country needs to fall into a depression, perhaps we need to get attacked again. Maybe then they will see what these policies gain us. The sad part is I doubt they would admit it even then. Since Obama is infallible no matter what happens in his administration the blame will some how fall back on Bush or the Republicans. The sickness that is liberalism is spreading, People are too blind to see they are being infected with it everyday whether they like it or not. At a time I had more faith in my country, and in my people. For a time I had faith that capitalism was safe and would always win out. The tragic truth is that my country is dying, capitalism is dying, and the citizens are to blame for it all.

I'm Drew D. and that is the sad, scary, tragic, and infuriating truth.

Loving A Liberal

2008-09-29T21:44:00.000-07:00

How can it be you might ask. How in the world could anyone love a liberal? As a man who is married to the "enemy" so to speak I will explain. My hope is to offer an analysis of this paradox that speaks to the skeptics and inspires those that are already part of one. To those of you involved in a Con/Lib relationship please know I fully understand all the hardships that you face at times. But as a man in the same position take it from me, it is worth the effort. To all the men in my boat I'm sure you know it can be very difficult. Especially if you hold your conservative values as close to your heart as I do. In fact I'm sure it has caused countless arguments between you and your significant other. In my case they would range from mild bickering to full blown insanity.

Why put up with all this you might ask. How could anyone who calls themselves conservative even be attracted to someone who has values we despise? Well to site a very cliche yet very accurate quote: "Love is Blind." In reality we do despise what the left represents, but if two people are meant for each other ideology loses priority. Let me be clear (so as to not anger my wife) I do not "despise" her beliefs. If I associated my hatred of liberals with my wife, well then she wouldn't be my wife. Truth is no matter what side your significant other is on you cherish them regardless.

Now as I mentioned earlier despite my love for my wife political arguments are inevitable. With my passion for the subject and my vehement opposition to some of her views it has gotten ugly at times. As a result she has often ended such arguments with " I don't want to talk about politics anymore." or "Let's not bring it up." The reality is that this is simply impossible. Politics surround us, they shape our culture, our economic systems, and our nation as a whole. Even with mild interest in the political arena it will come up. Our political viewpoints shape the way we look at the world and in a way mold us into who we are.

My wife and I have been together a long long time and we weren't going to let politics get in the way. Let me retract that statement, SHE wasn't going to let politics get in the way. That's right folks, yours truly, the man who has been espousing unwavering love for your partner regardless of politics was ALMOST a hypocrite. During this election season I have been particularly offended and angered by the left in their attempts to hijack the country I LOVE and the one they HATE. Through this rage I looked at my wife as the true enemy, the embodiment of all that was wrong in America. How can you support such a worm as Obama? I would ask her. How can you be OK electing a man that wants to completely destroy this nation? What pushed me over the edge was when I started finding out just how radical Obama really is. The Ayers/Rev. Wright connections disgusted and enraged me. The way I saw it was that anyone who did not denounce these men and their connections to Obama must APPROVE of their actions and beliefs. When I confronted my wife about these issues my rage blinded me. Her response was that of what I perceived to be indifference, which as you can understand made me lose it.

What I did not realize was that my wife truly did not understand what I was even saying to her. She had never seen the evidence and was quite frankly ignoring me. Due to constant brawls in the recent months she was trying to avoid conflict at all costs. As a result of this horrible miscommunication I was on the verge of ending it all. I couldn't bare the fact that I was married to a woman that had no moral objection to treasonous individuals that are directly tied to her candidate. During this political/ideological melt down she made me realize something that has changed our relationship forever. She reminded me that she is not at all as involved or as interested in the political arena as I am. However she still has her own set of values and beliefs but is OPEN to discussion. She admitted she never even saw the evidence about the Ayers/Wright connection, and once she did I was relieved.

The good woman I knew I married came through to me as she showed her utter contempt for what she saw. She could not believe that Obama would associate with such types and is highly skeptical of him now as a result. While left leaning she is an independent thinker who can be reasoned with. A trait far too many leftists do not share. As we made up I realized another crucial factor. She is not totally to blame for her some what misguided views on certain issues. Just like many Americans she trusts the media that lies to us everyday. She took MSLSD at their word and took every piece of propaganda to heart. With nothing to compare this nonsense to one can understand her situation. Without hearing the truth on a daily basis by someone besides me ranting at her she was lost. Now that she is reading my blog, and actually listening to the RIGHT side of the issues she is taking a turn for the best. She is slowly seeing the light, she is seeing the lie that is liberalism, the hypocrisy of the left. This inspires me to send this message to all you frustrated husbands and boyfriends. Do not throw away your soul mate over such issues even if they mean the world to you. Because as all of us conservatives know, if you can effectively illustrate the facts to someone they will almost always fair on our side.

TIPS On How to Educate not Alienate:

A big mistake I often made with my wife was that I came across very condescending. This was because I was very used to debating people of her ilk, and would inadvertently treat her the same way I did them. Which was by my admission a little condescending, but completely justified. It is NOT however justifiable to be that way towards your wife. It is not just wrong, it is ineffective. If you do this she will A. Get angry B. Not listen to you. and C. Think your wrong. To avoid this make sure you keep the conversation a conversation and not a lecture. Be sure to ask questions that get you both talking. Be sure to bring up facts that someone who is not politically savvy can easily grasp and understand. The more facts you state and more pleasant the conversation the more they will absorb and consider. Be sure to illustrate key differences between the schools of thought. This comparison minus the gross media bias will change their perspective quickly. If you are as lucky as I am and your woman is very bright they will eventually see the light.

I owe my wife everything, she knows me better than I know myself. She stands behind my crazy ass through thick and thin. To throw that away because she was simply misinformed would have been tragic. Thank god one of us thinks straight occasionally. This whole blog was her idea. Don't ever let it get that far guys, your partner might not be so understanding. Just consider what I have said here today, remember that if you truly love her she is worth the effort. It's a little more fun and interesting having someone that gives you a run for your money anyway. Inform them, discuss things with them, and you will find that it can be extremely rewarding.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

2008-09-28T19:43:00.000-07:00

Barack That Vote Kids!!!

2008-09-27T16:30:00.000-07:00

Every year this great little organization and others of similar ilk scamper around promoting "voter advocacy." In other words it's the biggest crock going. As I'm sure this does not come as news to many of you it is extraordinarily shameful this year. All I see is these poor folk suffering from the most severe cases of liberalism ever recorded trying to con votes out of young people. Their practices during this election cycle are absolutely shameful. If only they had any shame to begin with.

All I hear is them hooting and hollering; "Get Out and Vote"! "Stand up and be Heard"!! "Get out and Register"! "Let them hear your voice"! Again I say, WHAT A CROCK. What they are really saying is, "Get out and Vote (Democrat)"! "Stand Up and Join the Fight of Communism"! "Get Out and Register (Democrat)"! "Let them hear how you are liberal"!! The hypocrisy is that while saying they want kids to voice their choice and register, they only want them to do so if it's the liberal voice and a Democratic registration. These people aren't calling for the youth of America to think for themselves and vote accordingly. They are calling for the youth of America to blindly follow the liberal lie and the 2nd grade graduate rappers that litter MTV.

The whole thing is disgusting and insulting to the youth of America. The saddest part about it is that all too many young people are too stupid to see it. They really believe this garbage that is fed to them through "music television." I really think they believe that Queen Latifah and Kanye West (all very highly intellectual people) know what their talking about. "Barack the Vote" does not call for kids to research the issues, gather the facts, and make informed political decisions. If kids actually did that they might actually vote dare I say, Republican! God Forbid! Even if they brush on the theory that the youth should get informed they disguise that sentiment with endless propaganda about the "issues".

I had the great pleasure of attending a great Communist training camp called a college in NE New England during the 2004 election. There I heard much of those "Let your Voice be Heard" slogans. So I took what they said to heart, I studied the issues and developed my opinion, my "voice." I did want to register, I wanted to register Republican. I did want to be heard, I wanted the nation to hear I wanted George W. Bush. I wanted to Rock the Vote!!! But for some reason I wasn't met with the same enthusiasm as I did when they first approached me. Why not? I thought I was supposed to voice my opinion? I thought that I was supposed to do my part? Ohhhhhhhhh, I see, only if I vote the way YOU want me to. I remember the day of the election they were rounding up us kids and piling them in vans to go "rock the vote." So I wandered up to the vans that were for some reason covered in Kerry signs and asked what are you doing? They said "we are bringing people down to vote their voice, do you want to go!" I said "sure, that would be great!" Then a girl said to me, "isn't it great that we are all together and doing our part to elect John Kerry?" I said, "well it is great, but I am not voting for John Kerry." She was appalled, she was ANGRY, she said, "WHAT?" "Oh my god." I replied "well I thought we were all supposed to have our own voice." Next thing I know, there "isn't enough room" in the vans any more for me or my voice. So then I realized what they were really saying to me that whole time. "Vote!", "Be Heard!", "Do your part!", but only if your going to vote liberal. If your not then just shut up and stay home. How very "Democratic" of them.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Rev. Gore

2008-09-27T11:19:00.000-07:00

Has this guy just completely gone off the deep end or what? I really think he should have been evaluated after the 2000 election. If he was he would still be in a straight jacket today instead of running around trying to be important (or relevant) again. Here is an interesting piece about "global "warming" and it's architect.

This guy has transformed from a horribly mediocre politician to a horribly laughable Pastor of environmental nonsense and propaganda. You might have heard of his very insightful and very honest film "An Inconvenient Truth," how very moving. In fact he has taken pages out of Rev. Wrights play book in terms of anger and plain insanity. Maybe I'm wrong though, maybe this poor delusional man is right. Maybe we really do only have "ten years left to keep the world from scorching." I guess we should start the countdown.

I'm Drew D. and that's the "inconvenient" truth.

Socialism is the Answer

2008-09-26T18:14:00.001-07:00

As I watch this horrid debate between the two candidates one thing clearly distinguishes the two. One man believes in this country and it's fundamental foundation of capitalism. The other man child believes that this country is wrong, and it's systems are wrong. In order to re-create this nation in his image we must tear down everything now in place. Unfortunately too many Americans seem to agree with this trend and believe this utter BS that he spews. He said just now that "the fundamentals are wrong". Finally a shred of truth from the great one. He does think they are wrong, he hates capitalism, he hates what this country was built on, and hates everything we stand for.

It is down right petrifying just how similar he and Karl Marx are. I mean Obama is taking mantras right out of the Communist Manifesto and nobody is batting an eye lash. All I am hearing is "working class" this, and "rich people" that. Take from the corrupt rich people, give to the "poor". Everyone deserves the same, nobody should be exceptional and if they are they will be punished. Tear down capitalism because "look at how it has failed." "Let us build a Socialist utopia" where no problems like the current ones we face will ever happen. Let the holy government run the affairs of the economy and the private sector because they know what's best.

Lie after lie this piece of human waste spews from the podium. One after the other and it seems that more than half of America is eating it right up. Telling us lies about taxes, saying he "only wants to tax the rich" which in itself is Socialist but regardless is completely un-true. Stripping the Bush tax cuts that have saved those who make 42k/year of tens of thousands of dollars is not helping the "working man". Does anyone believe that Obama is going to "lower taxes" like he keeps saying when that contradicts the core value of the Democratic party? All I hear from Obama is "workers revolution" propaganda. Capitalism is evil and the "workers" are suffering nonsense that is as outdated and plain WRONG as the day it was published in the Communist Manifesto.

Lie #2 : Saying he is "open to all alternative energy's" and will "gain us energy independence."

Fact: He is completely against EVERYTHING. Against oil drilling that would make us secure as a nation. Against developing nuclear networks that could power a vast portion of America with little risk. His theory is that we will magically become independent by keeping our tires inflated and start running 747's on vegetable oil.

The really sad and depressing thing about all of this is that people seem to accept this Socialist propaganda as right and true. This man is clearly saying that he "fundamentally doesn't agree" with this country and how it runs. He is clearly stating that he will tear down EVERY last trace of capitalism to rebuild it in his twisted image of glory that is socialism. Despite all of this people will vote for him, and he is a hair away from completing his mission of destroying America as we know it. Are people really so simple to think that because a Republican is in office that Republicans caused this economic crisis? They really believe that with Lord Obama that this would have never happened? They really don't see the obvious connection between the Democratic party and these institutions? I assume that Americans are far dumber than I gave them credit for. Now those of you with a brain and those of you with American pride are excluded from this tirade, but those of you who want this Socialist revolution are not.

Why do Democrats and the Lie berals hate this country?

They hate this country because it goes against everything they believe. The very ideology that we represent today is the exact ideology that they and their savior Obama want to "change." The sickest thing about these people is that they vehemently root against this country while they arrogantly live in it. When things go bad for the country it benefits them and their desires for "change." They celebrate this economic crisis and use it as ammunition to fire at capitalism. They celebrate our struggles in Iraq and mock the efforts of our fine troops. They want us to fail so that in some sick way it proves that they and their twisted ideas are right. In my opinion their existence is appalling and simply treasonous. Let them get what they want, let them elect this second coming of Jesus, let them "change" this country, and let us watch America as we know it disappear. I can't wait for the great Socialist utopia of peace and justice. I can't wait for global peace as the Messiah talks every lunatic dictator off the ledge of genocide. Won't it be a wonderful world?

I'm Drew D. and that is the awful, scary, and sickening truth.

Blow it Out Your Fannie

2008-09-25T16:23:00.001-07:00

I know, I know, everyone is pretty tired of hearing about this whole "financial crisis" issue. But I have a few things I want t to rant about and as long as Barry isn't in office and it's still a free country I will rant away.

This whole disaster was completely spurred by the down right criminal quasi governmental firms known as Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. These great little gems of housing hell have been ran by thieves and what's even worse, supported by them. For anyone who doesn't know, these firms were totally in the tank for the Democratic elite. For years Republicans have been yelling for SOME kind of over sight of these companies. John Mccain in particular has been warning of impending disasters since 2000. He co-sponsored the Housing Reform Act in 2005 and again warned us all, obviously to no avail. Interestingly the roles were reversed for a time. Republicans saw the corruption for what it was and had to insist in regulation that was reasonable. The Democrat's however did not want their campaign piggy banks raided and stood in the way of this process consistently.

Now today who do you think are the one's out there screaming how the "low down private firms of capitalism" are screwing Americans? You guessed it, the Blame Party, and capitalism remains the target. What's so infuriating is the fact that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have the audacity to be the first one's pretending to be so upset over this situation. When together they ran and supported the very firms that they are now railing against. When John Mccain was yelling for reform Barney Frank was yelling back "everything is just fine." When the Housing Reform Act was on the floor Chris Dodd interfered as he stuffed his pockets with Fannie contributions. Now while Chris Dodd took the most amount of money from Fannie who was second in line? Why the Messiah, the Savior, the chosen one, Lord Obama of course.

Do people really believe this schmuck? Do they really believe him when he is now trying to take CREDIT for "blowing the whistle" on the corruption of Fannie Mae? I mean are you kidding me? This guy wasn't even around when Mccain was pushing for reform, never mind "blowing any whistles." The words "Housing Corruption" didn't even come out of his mouth until early this year for god sake! Why would Obama ask to police a firm that is lining his pockets second only to the honorable Dodd? If you were wondering that isn't the only thing that is blowing my mind. Why Mccain is not jumping all over this issue and pointing the source directly at Obama and his cronies is beyond me. Tell people how Franklin Raines, the head of Fannie Mae and a CRIMINAL is ADVISING Obama on "housing and mortgage issues." Just adding to the fine list of mentors that Obama has surrounded himself with.

This whole fiasco has done nothing but give the Socialist revolution more perverted ammunition to shoot down capitalism. Day after day we hear insistent brain dead Dem's tell us that this is the result of free markets run a muck. BS, this is SOCIALISM run a muck, lack of regulation was only the tip of the ice burg. The true cause of this whole entire disaster, from corrupt CEO's to delinquent loan practices is the implementation of Socialist policies by a Socialist congress. FORCING lenders by threat of penalty to lend to UNQUALIFIED applicants is the true culprit. This whole theory that a house is some how a right disgusts me and disgusts everyone that ever actually worked for one. It's called working, a concept that escapes the left (see my Work Ethic piece). Let's not blame the free market for problems solely created by Socialist methodology.

The Free Market Alternative to the Bailout

With the first preposterous bailout plan presented by Henry Paulson with a $700 billion price tag I had become even more frustrated. It has put fiscal conservatives in a very unique bind. On one hand the very idea of a bailout goes against everything we believe, and on the other it seemed sadly necessary to avoid widespread economic disaster. I had been depressed about the whole thing until I heard about a new idea that was much more to my liking. This alternative plan was to use the free market variables to cushion the blow to Wall St. Not only does this plan come with a smaller price tag, but it doesn't put the bulk of the burden on the tax payer. To summarize this complicated plan it is basically a helping hand, not a hand out. The government will purchase distressed mortgage backed securities in order to sell them at a profit later on. In addition Republican congressmen have proposed an incentive for firms to hold on to the frozen assets by offering FDIC backing. The hope is to inspire more private investment into the market so that it can bounce back on it's own without sticking us with the bill. This idea is something I can get on board with, so of coarse the Dem's will try to shoot it down.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

God Help Us

2008-09-22T20:21:00.000-07:00

There is a rumor that Obama will be ditching Joe Biden as the VP pick in order to bring on the one and only she-devil Billary Clinton. This is probably the most frightening development that has yet to occur in this election process. The story goes that Joe Biden will "step down" as VP pick on Oct. 5th citing an "aneurysm" as the excuse.

As we all know the extensively ruthless and corrupt Democratic party has been steadily haggling with Joe Biden to step down. I'm sure the figure is quite large, but whatever it is it's enough to make Joe go away. This shows us just how little the Dem's think of the voters. They firmly believe that pandering works and that they will eat up whatever verbal sewage is fed to them.

Regardless, the Obama/Clinton ticket will drastically change the election and quite frankly it petrifies me. There are enough communists' in this country to make these horrifying people the leaders of the free (but not for long) world. So the MOST radically leftist senator will be joined by the SECOND MOST radical senator, what a dream team huh folks?

With this pair in power we can all forget about this country because it's over. I'm not being dramatic people, it's over. It angers me and frustrates me beyond comprehension that the walking brain dead of this country (LIBERALS) truly want this. In some sick way I actually want them to get what they thirst for so they can live through the hell with the rest of us. So they can see what their precious socialism gets them, to see the "paradise" that it creates. The sad thing is while we wallow in the socialist pit these absolute degenerate jack asses will defend it.

The one ray of hope that we have is that ego's continue to guide the liberal agenda. Obama's ego would tell him that he doesn't want Billary constantly breathing down his neck as VP. Billary has already been VP once and is hell bent on being number one, and if she still thinks she has it bagged for 2012 then why help him? However, these are the Clintons we are talking about, who have already gotten rid of plenty of others in their way. I would not put it past Billary to accept the nomination just to "accidentally" fall into the top spot sometime during Obama's first term. Bill Clinton has stated that in no way is Billary interested in this position, but I mean this is Bill Clinton, not exactly the picture of honesty. In fact, we can't believe a word out of this mans mouth, so who knows. All we can do is pray.

I'm Drew D. and that is the horrible, horrible truth.

Mexicans are Dumb and UnSkilled

2008-09-21T14:54:00.000-07:00

Caught your eye didn't it, that is the same hope the Obama camp had when they put out the ludicrous and insulting ad tying lies about Rush Limbaugh to John Mccain.

The ad that ran in four key southwestern states with large Hispanic populations (cleverly distributed in Spanish) portrayed Rush Limbaugh and Mccain as one in the same. The only problem with this is that not only did they out right lie about comments made by Rush, they connected two people that have opposite views on the issue at hand. Anyone who looks up from the NY Times for even a second should know that Rush Limbaugh has staunchly disagreed with Mccains immigration reform policies.

This ad was absolutely insulting to the Hispanic populations of the states it was released in. Not only is it insulting it's as racist as they make Rush Limbaugh out to be as explained here in this interview. Assuming the targeted demographic of this ad was stupid enough to believe that a vote for Mccain is a vote for a racist Rush shows us just how the left and the Obama camp view American voters. Just another clear example of how the left is wildly thrashing about for any vote what so ever by any means necessary.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Bourne Moron

2008-09-21T00:28:00.000-07:00

The honorable Mr. Damon has decided to show the world his political savy. Not only is Mr. Damon incredibly articulate and intelligent but is also a medium into the future! He knows John Mccain will be dead by the end of his first term. If this guy can tell the future maybe he could tell me when his career will be over so nobody else has to be subjected to his stupidity. A bad Disney movie? I'll tell you what is a bad Disney movie; a radical leftist community agitator comes up in South Chicago under the guidance of Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright, buys his way into the Senate where he sneaks through by voting present for 143 days and then manipulates the American people to become the leader of the free world. That is not only a bad Disney movie, it's a Shakespearean tragedy. How so non-elitist Matt Damon is with his down to earth take on the average town and average local official in America.

Maybe somebody should fax Gov. Palin's resume to Mr. Damon. If you didn't know Mr. Medium , Palin was a governor, not just a "mayor of a piss ant little town." Let's just say that she WAS only a mayor, that is still a whole heck of alot more executive experience than the great Messiah ever had. Not to mention the Great Damon's view on national security and how Obama will be such a tough match for Vladamir Putin. But wait, what am I saying? This is a very smart man we are talking about, I mean he participated in a highly intricate robbery of a Vegas casino, he is a child genius from Boston, and is an exceptional poker player. Oh wait, those were just movies. Well I mean you have to be pretty smart to remember all those lines right? You can't possibly question Jason Bourne when it comes to national security can you?

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Underground Connection

2008-09-20T19:45:00.001-07:00

Just how far out is Barack Obama? Oh not too far just take a look at some of his fine upstanding friends. I know I know liberals, he was just a young innocent lad roaming the country side when all this stuff was going down. Well he wasn't a young lad when Ayers started taking him under his wing and orchestrating his political career.

Obama has been groomed by the best mentors a good American could ask for. Like this great man, the extremely inspirational "pastor" Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This is a "church" that has a very interesting view of who deserves a lifetime achievement award. Now you tell me, does this man seem like a "centrist" to you? Or is that just the wool he's trying to pull over the eyes of the people, I choose to believe the latter.

I'm Drew D. and that is unfortunately the truth.

Obama is Jesus

2008-09-20T11:16:00.000-07:00

Now the chosen one is truly being recognized by the left as not only an infallible emperor but also the holy savior. The counters from the left just get wackier and wackier don't they? Gov. Palin simply pointed out that Obama has some nerve to attack small town mayors when he has never even ran one he just "organized" one. The response from the left to this clear distinction between the two? Relate one to the son of god and the other to the person who killed him, guess which one's which.
This campaign "strategy" is holding true across the board. Mccain/Palin expose Obama's socialist tax policies and Biden responds by saying it's "PATRIOTIC" to pay higher taxes. Just more evidence that the slow witted liberals are in full panic mode. They don't even know what to say anymore since the baffling VP pick came on the scene. I think I saw some liberal heads literally explode when Sarah Palin walked out on stage. I personally can't wait for the debate between Palin/Biden, it should be one interesting exchange to say the least. If you libs want to say a prayer for Biden I suggest you do it now, oh but wait, you don't pray, so I guess write another article about Palins daughter or something.
The comparison between the rights BOTTOM of the ticket and the lefts TOP of the ticket:

Barry Obama's Resume:

1. 143 days in Senate, voted "present" more often than "yes" or "no".

2. Passed ZERO pieces of legislation and proposed no bills.

3. Never has run a city, or even a "small town"

4. Never has run a state, even a little ol one like Alaska (which is the most important state of natural resources we have).

5. Never has ran a business.

6. Never has directed a national guard.

7. Never has managed and guided people through crisis.

8. Never had to balance a budget.

9. Never has stood up for what he believes over what his party believes.

10. Never has taken on corruption in his own party.

Sarah Palin's Resume:

1. Has become GOVERNOR, not a SENATOR, big difference. I like how the Obama media always highlights her as "the mayor of a small town." Not to mention she is the most popular governor in the country.

2. Has ran a city before her state.

3. Has run a business before a city.

4. Has balanced a budget, payroll, etc. She did this in the private sector, local level, and state level, so I think she's "experienced" when it comes to that.

5. Has provided energy relief to Alaskans and will be bringing natural gas to all Americans via the pipeline.

6. Has cut gas taxes and used her veto pen to save Alaskans 1/2 a billion dollars.

7. Has taken on corruption in her own party and WON, has taken down the good ol' boy networks and doesn't apologize for it.

8. Has directed one of the most active branches of the National Guard.

Now you tell me, if you were to hire one of these people for a job, which one would you pick? The left loves their little one liners they all share like, " Do you really want her staring down Vladamir Putin"? DAMN RIGHT! I much rather have her do it than baby Barry. Please, this man would either run away and vote present to avoid the conflict or just agree with Putin and join in the America bashing. Either way I rather have Palin at the top of my ticket than see the Messiah get in.

Another thing that strikes me is yet another great hypocrisy of the left. The left is the champion of the "little guy", the "common working man". That is an unqualified LIE, they LIE to the middle class, insult the middle class, and manipulate those who are uninformed. They are elitists at the highest level, and people are seeing through it. If they are so for the little guy then why make fun of Palin because she ran a "small town"? Newsflash great emperor, this country runs on small towns. Why attack her for being just a regular hockey mom (even though she is far more than that)? I thought you leftists were the advocates for the "little people", for working men like her husband who is in the Steel Workers Union. The left will say their ideas represent the main stream of America. If the mainstream beliefs of America don't extend past San Fran Sicko or the uptown Manhattan area then their right.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Green Issue

2008-09-19T21:59:00.001-07:00

Barry Obama is trying to convince us that he will create a utopia of energy independence within the next ten years. This is not only a completely unrealistic target, but without any clear strategy of how he would actually achieve this makes his assertion ridiculous.
When we have a speaker of the House that literally closes up shop in order to prevent a simple up or down vote I really don't see any advancement in sight. How immature do you have to be to shut off the lights, switch off the mics, and toss the press out just so you don't have to even HEAR what the other side has to say. That's like a two year old having a fit shaking their head wildly as they cover their ears and close their eyes because they can't have a candy bar. The Messiah feels that we can become energy independent with the following plan: Magic. A very intricate plan I know but innovative none the less.

What I think the liberals just don't understand is, well, the economy. While this doesn't come as a complete shock to most of us I feel I need to reiterate. Our economy literally runs on oil, without it we would fall faster than a rock in water. This aspect of the economy is simply not going to change over night. Do we need to continue exploring and developing alternative methods of energy? Without question, but that doesn't take away from the fact that we will still need oil. Plastic is used to produce virtually everything, we aren't all going to toss our cars that we haven't even paid off yet, and our houses won't miraculously start being ran on wind. Before everyone jumps on me for not "understanding" or considering the alternatives let me be clear. I am not saying that we shouldn't continue to develop wind, solar, and hybrid technologies. We should and need to do so, but it's just not economically or practically feasible yet.

Building hybrid cars is fine, but what about everything else? What about the trucks that keep our economy moving, what about the planes that get us around the world? For some reason I don't see us flying on a 747 that runs on vegetable oil any time soon. I don't see an eighteen wheeler cruising across the country pulling a 50,000 lb. load running on electricity. Is this a possibility in the future, perhaps, is it a possibility tomorrow? No. So until that day comes we NEED oil, and we need to get it by any means necessary.

The left needs to stop with this "environmental" verbal sewage and start seeing things for how they really are. This is no longer an "eco" issue, this is a security issue. Now the liberals will be the first to tell you that there is no oil worth drilling for in ANWAR. That is FALSE, an absolute fabrication by the green people. Talk to people in Gov. Palin's home state and see what they say, they say drill, and drill now. There is a reason for this ever growing sentiment. The reason is that there is OIL there, not a little, not a "negligible amount", A LOT. Enough oil to almost completely eliminate our dependence on foreign supply. Foreign oil that we should have dibs on anyway. For a group of people that is convinced that this war was over oil I'd like to ask where is it? Where are our American pumps on Iraqi wells? Why is a tank of gas requiring a federal loan? One of the reasons is that Obama and his cronies have successfully boxed out American oil companies from getting the contracts.

Iraq decided to start selling it to China because China isn't requiring them to install "hydrocarbon" laws before hand like we are. In my opinion we are OWED that oil, the least they could do for liberating them is pay us back with that billion dollar reservoir under their feet.
The Democratic strategy is to do nothing, do nothing and pray that tomorrow we will fly to Europe on a glider and use crops tilled by tractors that run on smiles and hugs. This is the dream to them but is a nightmare in reality. DRILL!!!!, has anyone seen the ANWAR region? When I first heard about ANWAR I pictured evergreens as far as the eye could see, running rivers with bears all around and eagles in the sky. When I actually saw it I thought I was looking at a frozen tundra, oh wait, I WAS looking at a frozen tundra. We could install an above ground pipeline and very strategic drilling points that wouldn't even disturb the precious caribou that the liberals cry about. In fact where there has been other above ground pipelines animal populations increased because they huddle next to it for the heat !! The AWAR region is about 90 million acres, we want to use about 2,000, you do the math.

The relation between domestic drilling and national security completely escapes the left. I speak with many of them, not totally by choice, and they seem to be lost on the idea. They feel that first, there is only a couple of gallons in ANWAR, and second that we would still go to war with other countries because we are just plain evil. They want the oil companies to start investing in alternative energy. Does that make any sense? Why would a company that sells PETROLEUM invest in the competition? That's like Delta Airlines buying Amtrack stock, or Burger King opening health food stores, apples and oranges. Just yet another example of the lefts gross misunderstanding of the economy. Without drilling our own oil, and continue being at the mercy of countries that hate us the drama will be ever increasing. Let's create our own oil infrastructure, let's keep the money from flowing to people who want to destroy us and let's announce our energy independence to the world.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Anti-Obama = Racist

2008-09-18T21:10:00.002-07:00

Just a heads up to all those who dare challenge the views of the Emperor Obama. Turns out that if you disagree with anything he says you are simply a racist. Didn't think you were? Too bad, you are, and the liberals say it so it's obviously fact. They are trying to put this man behind a firewall so nobody can question the hundreds of things there are to question. You oppose the great one? Well your just a racist that's all there is to it. No, I am not a racist of any kind, I just think this completely inexperienced leftist wacko will run our country into the ground if it doesn't get bombed first.

This racism card is played commonly by the left, it is a simplistic easy to use, go to response to any well thought out objection to these people. Stands to reason, simplistic people often use simplistic un-educated responses. The reason for this is because they HAVE no educated responses. They, like Obama, use bumper sticker statements and distorted "facts" to argue their point, and if all else fails call the person racist.

This accusation has not just been applied to this situation, take immigration for example. If you feel that we should actually HAVE borders, and enforce immigration laws you just hate Mexicans. See how easy it is not to debate? Check it out, Right: "I really think that we should control our borders, it is an issue of national security." Left: "Your just racist and don't want Mexicans coming in." Works like a charm.
Nobody on the right ever said anything regarding Barrys race, it was Obama himself who brought it up and wouldn't let it go. It seems to me he cares about his race more than we do. It's simply a scare tactic, a pathetic last stitch effort by the left to guilt trip voters. Well folks, I hope you aren't so gullible and I know your not. I know that you will see through this sham and see him for the empty suit he is. Trust me, your not racist if you don't vote for him, your just intelligent.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

WORK ETHIC

2008-09-18T21:10:00.001-07:00

Work ethic is something I feel too many Americans have completely abandoned or forgot about. Primarily the left side of the population. What reminded of this was when I recently heard the Messiah's latest speech. Lord Obama was out there speaking boldly and profoundly about revelations that I think he just had about this country. Here is what he said: "If your a kid coming up in poverty, your on your own, if your a young person coming up in the world and are struggling, your on your own." Hmm, am I the only one in the world that thought UH YEAH! every time he said "your on your own". WELCOME TO CAPITALISM EMPEROR OBAMA if you don't like it please go to a country that embraces your beliefs. May I suggest Cuba, France, Denmark, Canada, or even China.

In this country you ARE on your own, this is not a group effort, that is what communism is and that is why this country is great. We believe in the individual, we believe in every person having the right to become anything they want unfettered by the government. You want to get out of poverty? Then you WORK, you work your tail off, you save your money, you don't buy the hottest new clothes, you don't go out every night or even every weekend. You work your way out of poverty and make something of yourself. Your struggling? THEN YOU WORK, you work over time, you sacrifice that new TV you wanted, you do what it takes to make it. That is the American spirit, that is what has built this country from the ground up. What is great about this country NOT being socialist or communist is that we are given the rights and opportunities to pursue our own INDIVIDUAL dreams.

Here is an example of work ethic that has unfortunately escaped many. I heard this on the Michael Savage program but it relates to my town as well. In my town there was this little Asian shop in the Mini Mall Plaza, They were immigrants here and had almost nothing to their name and started the shop with what they had. They worked 24 hrs a day, and they did it without complaining in fact quite the opposite. They were THRILLED to actually be ABLE to work 24 hrs, to build their own future, to be independent without the government asking for anything.

So time went on and they continued to work and eventually saved enough money to buy the store next to them. Because they were sacrificing, working and persevering through the challenges they were advancing, they were succeeding, they were living the American dream. Later on after driving the same 85' Mazda for five years they brought their family over from Korea and put them to work. A few years later that same family built a whole other complex right across the street. They didn't bitch, they didn't complain, they worked, they didn't whine about racism, they didn't whine about the challenges, they didn't look for the handouts, they worked, they worked and they succeeded, they lived the dream.

Now some will say, "I don't want to live like that, I don't want to work like that." That's totally fine and your choice as an American, but then don't expect to be taken care of by those who DID chose to work. Unfortunately the left feels that this is over rated, that just because someone CHOOSES not to work they should still be provided for. They should have everything their neighbor has because that is whats "just". The modern person has dumped the work ethic model and adopted the liberal way. "Ohhhhhh, ya know the job I want just isn't out there I'll just stay home." "Ohhhhhhh on second thought my back kinda hurts maybe I can get some social welfare programs to support me." "Ohhhhhhhh ya know what I kinda like this not working and collecting checks thing so maybe I'll just keep it up" "Ya know what I think that I could find another welfare program to give me a little more so now I can start up a nice crack habit."

That is the road work ethic is taking in America and unfortunately presidential candidates like the Emperor Obama advocate more and more of this behavior. In fact the clever liberals are now trying to justify their Marxist views by saying its PATRIOTIC to be so. Like Biden said, lets be "patriotic" and give the money from the hard working small business owners to the middle class people (who are often middle class themselves). They have a word for taxing one group and giving it to the other that didn't earn it, its called socialism. The fundamental problem that nobody realizes is that socialism stagnates progress and growth. Take France for example where its ILLEGAL to work more than 30 hrs a week. You want to become extraordinary ? Too bad, ordinary is the way you'll be so sayeth the government.

Why work harder than my neighbor if we both end up getting the same? Why should I try and better my life when I can let my neighbor do the work and the government give me my "cut"? Why dream about things I can never have because we are doomed to a life of mediocrity anyway? The desire for a better life disappears because the government doesn't allow it. Socialist countries squash dreams, reward irresponsible behavior and discourage advancement of any kind. This is the great "change" the messiah Obama wants to make in this country, and if Americans don't wake up and see what is happening it will be to late. It reminds me of a little known quote once said by a little known politician; "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

THE TRUTH TRAINING COARSE

2008-09-18T21:10:00.000-07:00

Welcome to The Truth, where the lie that is liberalism is exposed one word at a time.

Introduction:

This is the most unique and equally trying time in American history since its inception (minus World Wars, depressions, etc). Never before have we seen the threat to America's fundamental values, systems and underlying fabric become such a possible reality. It is truly scary to those of us who embrace the American spirit and the essential blueprint for our success , Capitalism. However, for those who wish to see Capitalism go extinct it is a glorious time. Let's look at the presidential candidate, the anointed one, the Messiah, the savior, Lord Obama Hussein. This is a man who is by far the most radically leftest senator in history and freely associates himself with his mentors like Rev. J. Wright and William Ayers to name a few. The scary thing about this candidacy is his vast support and the very real possibility that this man could single handedly (with the help of a Dem controlled House and Senate "change" the country forever. As he once said he "learned many things while in Europe," the only problem is I think he brought those things back to the US. But why you might ask, why would Americans support such a man? Well because all too many Americans feel that socialism is the answer.

Many have asked me the difference between the economic systems of past and present and as a study of these I have concluded that I am a strong advocate of Capitalism. As I dug my way through the ivory towers of school, entrenched in the professorial verbal sewage chanted by Marxists' I have come to think independently. It is proven by looking at our country, the experiments in China and other developing parts of the world that Capitalism is the true path to prosperity. While no system is perfect its foundation is sound. Liberals of today despise this system, in fact they fight to rid of it all together. They salivate for the socialist uprising in sight, while this seems maniacal to us reasonable and intelligent people it is the only way for them. Why you ask? I will explain the best I can, because as we all know liberalism is a mental disorder.

EXPLORING THE SOCIALIST DELUSION:

Socialist's hate capitalism because of its core value that those who work hard are rewarded. To them nobody should have more than another no matter what. Universal mediocrity is the name of the game in socialism. Where everyone has the same, where everyone lives in squalor and those who want to get out of squalor can't because its "wrong". There is no exceptional success's in socialism because success contradicts the basis of the system. Some of us simply can't succeed so those who can mustn't be allowed to do so because its "not fair." How it's not fair remains to be seen only by those who espouse this twisted belief. Dem's of today would frankly get rid of rich people. They are evil, greedy, and criminal, they only made their money through exploiting the common worker and using corruption as a tool for advancement. These beliefs are not my own , they have been written before, a long long time ago by a man named Karl Marx, every heard of him? This is quite ironic considering many of the richest people are liberal Democrats, the key here is, THEY should be rich and nobody else. Ask George Cloony, or Matt Damon or any other incredibly delusional slow witted lib : "Since you think tax cuts are so unfair and that rich people don't deserve their money how about cutting a check back to the government for all that saved $$ ??" I have a feeling they won't respond.

The distribution of wealth is the core of Socialism and is the core of Barry Obama's beliefs. Take from those who have succeeded and give to those who didn't earn it and more often than not don't deserve it. This theory is wrong on so many levels I will have to simplify it the best I can.
Capitalism encourages individuals to control their destiny, it allows one person to achieve any dream he/she has. No where in this doctrine does it say you will or SHOULD BE successful it merely presents the opportunities. Desire is what fuels those in a capitalist society, the desire not just for material things but desire for a better life , the desire to provide for their family, the desire to prepare for the future. The driving force behind desire is greed, yes that dirty word, GREED. GREED ladies and gentlemen is GOOD. Before you start ranting and raving lets get it clear. I'm not talking about the greed of corrupt CEO's and politicians, I'm talking about greed in terms of what people want their lives to be.

Greed has been made out to be deplorable by the left, a destroyer of man. Quite the contrary, greed has built the greatest nation on the planet. Greed is what drives a person to better their lives, to better their families lives. It drives us to work harder, to make more, to provide more, and in the end provide more to our country's economy. If one can never get ahead no matter what, no matter how hard they work, if one can't excel above his neighbor, if one can't dream about giving their families things they never had, then my friends you are talking about Socialism.

In Socialism there is no advancement, we are all the same, equally mediocre. You can't make more than me because the government says so, and if you do they will tax it out of your pocket and put "my share" in mine. You can't better your life because I can't better mine. Competition is a bi-product of greed and the Capitalist society. Since we have the freedom and liberty to grow and the freedom to choose who we do business with through the free market, those companies must strive to be the best. In a free market that company knows that the only way to win market share is to provide the best for the cheapest. Heavy competition not only benefits the consumer but the country as well. Products become better, prices fall and company's prosper and give their piece to the government. Which is far too much as it is, but with the Dem's in control not only do they what a much larger piece they often times what the WHOLE piece , they want control. That is another ingredient in Socialist societies, government control extends to EVERYTHING. There are no private firms because its not a FREE economy, its a nationalised firm owned and ran by the government. A bloated , slow moving, bureaucratic nightmare that wouldn't know a business if it bit them. This is what the left wants, they want this system, and they want Obama to install it.

THE SOCIALIST LOVE AFFAIR WITH TAXES:

This brings us to the biggest issue of both systems and our country's future, taxes, one of the only certainties. Taxes are not understood by the majority of Americans primarily because hardly anyone does. The US Tax Code makes the bible look like a pamphlet so you can only understand so much. What we can understand is the basic premise, purpose and ideas behind taxes. Taxes are what fuel the pocket book of big brother, they help provide social services on the state and federal level. Fiscal Conservatives believe that taxes should be minimized, they believe that interference by the government in personal and free market affairs does nothing but stifle the economy and its growth, I am one of these believers. Taxes you might be familiar with include income tax, payroll taxes (medicare, soc. security, etc.) small business taxes, corporate tax, capital gains tax, death tax, property tax, the list is endless, and that's the problem.

What most don't understand is that 60% of people DON"T pay income tax, commonly they don't even pay payroll taxes because they have "earned income credit" from the government. Under Lord Obama's rule these people would get more, and he would give more by taking more from YOU. His tax plan consists of nearly DOUBLING capital gains taxes, this means that every American investor would shuttle his capital out of the country further hurting the markets and economy. When capital flies out of the country our growth will slow to less than a percent. Capital gain taxes will go up to 25%, death taxes will go up, gas taxes will go up 10%, payroll taxes might double, you get the picture.

Dem's or "socialists" as I call them believe that the government is essentially smarter than the individual. That left to his/ her own devices the common man can't control their lives, the government needs to step in and do it for them even if its not in the individuals best interest. Therefore they want to tax endless $$ out of the payer and use it for their own ideas and social programs, instead of leaving more of it in the citizens own pocket for he himself to decide where it goes, like to provide for his family. Socialists hate private firms and want to control them and tax them because they hate the system it represents. The Messiah's VP Joe Biden said recently that his definition of patriotism meant taxing people more. I strongly believe that its in the lib's DNA, no matter what the situation it is a constant, raise taxes. He went on to say that its time for those making 200k or more a year to "pitch in" to get "America out of the rut" to (and this is the key part) " PUT THAT MONEY IN THE POCKETS OF THE MIDDLE CLASS" sound a little like re-distribution of wealth to you??? Just as a side note, re-distribution has been tried, and has failed miserably.

So basically what Biden is saying is that it's "patriotic" to steal from those who earned it and simply GIVE it to others. Um, I'm sorry but that sounds to me to be the exact opposite of what it means to be patriotic. I believe that a man working hard and making his own way in his life and giving the best to his family and striving to make his life better and better without it being handed to him is patriotic. I guess Charlie Rangle isn't too patriotic then, he just likes to raise the taxes, not pay them. The evil rich people do the following for the country: The top 10% of the tax bracket pay 75% of all taxes, they create jobs, they create wealth (across the board not just for themselves), they create economic growth, they fuel the markets. Just a few minor things the evil "rich" do for us. But let's assume what Biden says is true, let's assume that we will only tax the rich. Well that's just fine except that his plan is a downright lie. Repealing the Bush tax cuts (which his ticket will do) will take about 10k out of the pockets of people who make 42k/year. To all of you rich folk making 42k a year I hope your ready to trade in that gold fish tank and stop using cash as fire wood because Obama's in town.

DOWN WITH MARKETS, UP WITH REGULATIONS:

When it comes to the economy and the markets Dem's are literally clueless. Harry Reed in response to a question asked about how to deal with crashing markets " I don't know what we're gonna do." Sounds like a leader we want in Washington doesn't it? Basically if they can't complain or blame it on the Bush administration they just give up and go home. The worst thing that we ever did was bail out the corporate giants that killed themselves through miss-appropriation and corruption. This has given the federal government control over even more of the large capital corps. So now the very people that destroyed the company (Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac) now have complete control over it. The free market rules of conservatives say that no matter how big the firm we must let it sink or swim on its own. If they fail, that's the nature of the game, the government won't bail you out, and if they succeed we shouldn't be taxing them up the yin yang either. There's a reason why its called a FREE market people. This just opens the door to let Dem's knock the capitalist system even more. Yelling that private firms just can't be trusted and we need the good ol big brother to come in and set it straight. Please, is there anything more useless, bureaucratic and down right corrupt as the US federal government???

A FISH IS TO WATER AS A LIBERAL IS TO A GOOD LIE:

What really agitates me is the hypocrisy of the Dem's when it comes to the Fannie Mae/ Freddy Mac situation. These institutions solely ran by liberal democrats were run into the ground by criminal CEO's and GM's stealing the money out of the taxpayers pocket to give themselves 100 million dollar golden parachutes. Then Lord Obama has the audacity to try and attack this situation as a PLUS for his campaign in terms of harping on the "economy is horrible" chord and reciting the mantra; "when in doubt bail em out." So because a bunch of fraudulent housing officials at Freddy/Fannie gave $500,000 loans to people who make $50,000 a year you and I get to pay for it. We have to pay the price for the management cooking the books so they could get their bonuses. And the reason why these companies aren't coming under fire like Enron or World Com? Simple, its run by Dem's and Dem campaign revenue, and they don't attack their own. It's no secret that both Freddy and Fannie give millions to Democratic campaigns and have since inception. And who has received the most from these companies besides CT's own Chris Dodd (D) ? Why the messiah of coarse. Must be nice to accept all of those funds and then sit back to play devils advocate as he attacks them and tells us the conservative system is to blame.

The connection that Obama has to these firms and their leaders is downright criminal. He lets Franklin Rains pick his VP selection and then calls him for advice on the housing situation. Other top officials at Freddy Mac are his very own economic advisers, and Obama is on OUR side?
Only the sheeple will believe him, he is a fraud, a liar and a manipulator. He is systematically manipulating the American people, this is not persuasive argument, this is manipulation. Not a liar you say? Here's a few examples: Remember that stimulus package? He said he came up with it, that's right, it was all his idea. Fact, he wasn't even there to vote on the issue. Remember how he said he would do "everything it took" to fix the housing situation and the corrupt firms that lined his pockets? Fact, he has never voted on ANY of the reform housing legislation, as Sen. Mccain did in 2005. Why try to reform a firm that gives you millions? Remember how he said he is mere "acquaintances of William Ayers and didn't even know Rev. J Wright said the things he says? Fact, Lord Obama and Ayers were friends for years and worked together in South Chicago, both created the "Acorn Group" (A community agitation group), Obama's career was launched under Ayers supervision from his living room. Fact, Obama has been a member of Wrights church for 20 years and gave 23K a year to it, I'm pretty sure he might of caught Wrights little "sermons" here or there. Furthermore in his memoirs (which he wrote instead of legislation in the Senate) stated clearly that Wright was his "mentor" and "inspired him", sounds like he was more than an "acquaintance".

WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE:

Stemming from the housing and market disasters we are hearing more and more about the economy from the left side of the aisle. The way the two parties view the economy and thustly our country is vastly different primarily because we have enormously different economic ideals and values (or lack there of in the Dem's case). The fiscal conservatives believe in this system, they believe in the American spirit of industry, most of all they believe in the solidarity of our FREE market and have never wavering faith that it will correct itself. I am one of these people if you haven't determined that already. Conversely the Dem's portray a much different picture. I call it the "doom and gloom" viewpoint of the American economy. In the liberals mind we are falling off into space, chaos is upon is, the American economy is failing and we are doomed for eternity. Now my question is, if one truly believes that wouldn't you think they would try to change it or fix it. The tragic thing is they ARE trying to "fix" it by implementing there version of how a market should work, surprisingly spawned from their economic philosophy. The only thing is I don't think they are getting the memo that if it ain't broke don't fix it.

The Dem's see this as doom and gloom and the faithful see this as an opportunity. This economic crisis is not new, we have been through this time and time again (Black Tuesday). What happened on Black Tuesday? The market tanked, people lost everything, and then they turned around and invested their money back into the markets, bought securities at record lows and as a result the market bounced back, it steamed forward and reached record highs. That is the free market, that is the beauty of free trade and enterprise. The self controlling mechanisms WORK, they are tried and true. The American spirit to succeed and the DESIRE to succeed and excel drives this system through tough times and good.

The Dem's see it differently, obviously, because they despise capitalism and the markets are the foundation of the system they hate. 90% of investment in the American markets is based on FAITH, faith and trust in the American market and faith in the controls of it. Without this faith banks would crumble, markets would shut down, the treasury would be useless, money would become trivial. The entire system is based on the trust we have in this system, stands to reason we should support it right? Well in the Dem's case it couldn't be further from the truth. They will tell you that they have NO faith in the market, that without the government control corrupt greedy CEO's will take all the working mans money. They will tell the American people NOT to trust it and its a dangerous road to go down.

AMERICA IS THE PROBLEM:

At this point when the economy is hurting we need all the domestic business AND international business to thrive, but that's not happening. International companies and investors are pulling out their capital, they are fleeing from the American markets. How can they be expected to have faith in a system when they hear Harry Reed say he's not so sure, when Obama is convincing people that its not safe and its crumbling? How can you expect them to be confident in a country that taxes their own companies and regulates them out of business? The bail outs are not over, due to ever increasing regulation, corporate taxes etc. the auto industries and oil companies will be the next one's running to the soup line. Auto companies whom thrive in other companies because the government is not constantly in their way are getting killed in their own backyard. So what does the great Messiah propose if he gets in to "help" the economy? You guessed it, raise the corporate tax and add even more regulation, the socialist spirit at work.

This pessimistic theory holds true for virtually everything American for the left, mostly because they hate this country and everything it stands for. Just look at how they think we should present ourselves to the world. I love my country and am proud of my country and these people laugh at that. These spoiled little yuppies scoff at the flag that so many died protecting. They choose to apologize for this country, they join in when others bash us. When 100 years ago you would be jailed or worse for burning the flag now they want to give them ACLU lawyers. When Islamic extremists kill 5,000 Americans, they don't yell for justice, they don't yell for revenge. They don't stand in American pride by our flag and pray for damn nation of our enemies. Instead they ask "why"? Why would they do this? Let me save you the suspense, the answer is ALWAYS the UNITED STATES. WE are the problem, WE are to blame for "making them so angry". We should go "talk" to them and "reason" with these men to see "their side of things" , we should try and "understand" them. Instead of sending bombs we should send therapists and counselors.

Just typing it makes me want to vomit, I'm sorry but you can't reason with people who cut off their enemies heads with a rusty hack saw because they are an "infidel". But that is the liberal way, America is the big bad wolf and all the other countries of the world are sweet little innocent pigs that need to be "reasoned" with. This is the world view of Obama, when he went to Germany and preeched to the masses after screaming , "This is our time!!!" Um, who's time exactly???? I thought he was running for OUR country's office. But thats just it, he's NOT running for our country, he is running veimintly against it. He is running for all the countries in the world that hate us. He didn't try and represent our country to the president of Germany he joined in the America bashing. The president would bitch about us, and instead of defending us Obama agreed with him, and this will be the common place if this man gets in.

Our enemies are waiting with baited breathes for this man to get elected, they know it will be a sign of weakness. That sign of weakness will cause thousands and thousands of American deaths. Despite all the misplaced hatred for Pres. Bush and his administration everyone espesically ObamaMania TV forgets that this man has kept us safe for seven years since the 9/11 attack. SEVEN YEARS, people take this entirely for granted and it will bite them as soon as the next attack happens, and it most certainly will under Emperor Obamas rule. Seven years with not so much as one single bomb in the most dangerous global environment in history and do we hear about it? No. Do we hear about all the victories in the war on terror? No, we just hear about the horror we cause the world, the war mongering of Bush, the tragic violations of Islamic rights in prison camps.

LIBERALS ARE FAIR FOLK:

One more piece before I go, and this is a little off topic but relavant non the less. The liberal media dominates this country and its more obvious now than ever. The truth is the party that preeches "open mindedness" are the most closed minded people on the planet. They HATE the other view points and will do anything to keep them quiet. Another interesting thing Obama will support if elected is the "Fairness Doctrine". This UNfair doctrine is purely designed to silence conservative talk radio which has been voicing the truth and blowing the whistle on the lie which is liberalism for decades. They want a government mandate that all programs have eqal amount of people on with every viewpoint. How in the world is that considered living in a free country? It surprises me because places like MSLSD and other ObamaTV stations will have to put people like me on, which I'm sure they will do a great job of misrepresenting.

They know that talk radio can't and won't adapt to that kind of facism and will refuse to thus putting it out of business, which then leaves the American citizen with the only devine and infalable ideology , liberalism.These people preech about "tolerating" other's views but do everything in their power to squash them. They preech for the advancement of women and blacks, but only CERTAIN women and blacks. The "femenist" movement is not about the advancement of women, if so they would be thrilled about Gov. Pallin, instead they despise her. Because feminists believe in the advancement and rights of LIBERAL women. If the NAACP was for the advancement of colored people they would be thrilled that Clarence Thomas was elected Supreme Court judge, instead they spent thousands trashing him and trying to stop him. Because the NAACP is not a civil rights organization its a LIBERAL rights organization. In summation liberals are very tolerant people, they appreciate all views of all people. I forgot to mention that this only applies if you to are a liberal, if you don't agree with them then you can go to hell.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.