Thursday, January 22, 2009

Good Game America

Good game America, it was fun while it lasted. We enjoyed a marvelous period in history where freedom reigned supreme. For a brief time we prospered through the mechanisms of free market economies. We enjoyed a degree of independence from the federal government. But sadly, the brain dead, and brain washed Obama-zombies have decided to "change" all this. To adopt the extraordinarily successful systems of France, Germany, and the UK (thick sarcasm here.)

There once was a time when Americans would have been outraged at the release of its captured enemies, but today they vote for it. For a man who promised to put the rights of Americans first I find it strange how that equates to terrorist "rights." Obama has ordered that our most prominent detention center of our most dangerous enemies be closed within a year. Why, you might ask, I will tell you. He is closing it in "the name of national security and justice." That's right, you heard me right, NATIONAL SECURITY AND JUSTICE. We are going to release people that want to kill every American man, woman, and child, in the name of "national security." We are going to release these scum bags in the interest of their "rights." Since when is it "justice" to release prisoners that threaten our country? Since when do people who regret not being involved with 9/11 have rights? Since their ally and friend got into office, that's when. It makes perfect sense I suppose. Why not release the ones who have given you most of your campaign funds and support you unconditionally? You have to protect your friends in politics, that's part of the deal.

This is certainly the end of the greatest nation in the world and half of us welcome it. I hope that once this socialist utopia is achieved that people start to realize what they gave up. Unfortunately those who voted for it will never challenge it, and even if they did it will be far too late. Dick Morris, one of the most intelligent and insightful political pundints, contributors, and authors has wrote this excellent editorial. While this is a great editorial it leaves you wanting to slit your wrist, and honestly that might be the better way out considering the events to come.

The Obama presidency: Here comes Socialism

2009-2010 will rank with 1913-14, 1933-36, 1964-65 and 1981-82 as years that will permanently change our government, politics and lives. Just as the stars were aligned for Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson and Reagan, they are aligned for Obama. Simply put, we enter his administration as free-enterprise, market-dominated, laissez-faire America. We will shortly become like Germany, France, the United Kingdom, or Sweden — a socialist democracy in which the government dominates the economy, determines private-sector priorities and offers a vastly expanded range of services to many more people at much higher taxes.

Obama will accomplish his agenda of “reform” under the rubric of “recovery.” Using the electoral mandate bestowed on a Democratic Congress by restless voters and the economic power given his administration by terrified Americans, he will change our country fundamentally in the name of lifting the depression. His stimulus packages won’t do much to shorten the downturn — although they will make it less painful — but they will do a great deal to change our nation.

In implementing his agenda, Barack Obama will emulate the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Not the liberal mythology of the New Deal, but the actuality of what it accomplished.) When FDR took office, he was enormously successful in averting a total collapse of the banking system and the economy. But his New Deal measures only succeeded in lowering the unemployment rate from 23 percent in 1933, when he took office, to 13 percent in the summer of 1937. It never went lower. And his policies of over-regulation generated such business uncertainty that they triggered a second-term recession. Unemployment in 1938 rose to 17 percent and, in 1940, on the verge of the war-driven recovery, stood at 15 percent. (These data and the real story of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s missteps, uncolored by ideology, are available in The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes, copyright 2007.)

But in the name of a largely unsuccessful effort to end the Depression, Roosevelt passed crucial and permanent reforms that have dominated our lives ever since, including Social Security, the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, unionization under the Wagner Act, the federal minimum wage and a host of other fundamental changes.

Obama’s record will be similar, although less wise and more destructive. He will begin by passing every program for which liberals have lusted for decades, from alternative-energy sources to school renovations, infrastructure repairs and technology enhancements. These are all good programs, but they normally would be stretched out for years. But freed of any constraint on the deficit — indeed, empowered by a mandate to raise it as high as possible — Obama will do them all rather quickly.

But it is not his spending that will transform our political system, it is his tax and welfare policies. In the name of short-term stimulus, he will give every American family (who makes less than $200,000) a welfare check of $1,000 euphemistically called a refundable tax credit. And he will so sharply cut taxes on the middle class and the poor that the number of Americans who pay no federal income tax will rise from the current one-third of all households to more than half. In the process, he will create a permanent electoral majority that does not pay taxes, but counts on ever-expanding welfare checks from the government. The dependency on the dole, formerly limited in pre-Clinton days to 14 million women and children on Aid to Families with Dependent Children, will now grow to a clear majority of the American population.

Will he raise taxes? Why should he? With a congressional mandate to run the deficit up as high as need be, there is no reason to raise taxes now and risk aggravating the depression. Instead, Obama will follow the opposite of the Reagan strategy. Reagan cut taxes and increased the deficit so that liberals could not increase spending. Obama will raise spending and increase the deficit so that conservatives cannot cut taxes. And, when the economy is restored, he will raise taxes with impunity, since the only people who will have to pay them would be rich Republicans.

In the name of stabilizing the banking system, Obama will nationalize it. Using Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to write generous checks to needy financial institutions, his administration will demand preferred stock in exchange. Preferred stock gets dividends before common stockholders do. With the massive debt these companies will owe to the government, they will only be able to afford dividends for preferred stockholders — the government, not private investors. So who will buy common stock? And the government will demand that its bills be paid before any profits that might materialize are reinvested in the financial institution, so how will the value of the stocks ever grow? Devoid of private investors, these institutions will fall ever more under government control.

Obama will begin the process by limiting executive compensation. Then he will urge restructuring and lowering of home mortgages in danger of default (as the feds have already done with Citibank).
Then will come guidance on the loans to make and government instructions on the types of enterprises to favor. God grant that some Blagojevich type is not in charge of the program, using his power to line his pockets. The United States will find itself with an economic system comparable to that of Japan, where the all-powerful bureaucracy at MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) manages the economy, often making mistakes like giving mainframe computers priority over the development of laptops.

But it is the health care system that will experience the most dramatic and traumatic of changes. The current debate between erecting a Medicare-like governmental single payer or channeling coverage through private insurance misses the essential point. Without a lot more doctors, nurses, clinics, equipment and hospital beds, health resources will be strained to the breaking point. The people and equipment that now serve 250 million Americans and largely neglect all but the emergency needs of the other 50 million will now have to serve everyone. And, as government imposes ever more Draconian price controls and income limits on doctors, the supply of practitioners and equipment will decline as the demand escalates. Price increases will be out of the question, so the government will impose health care rationing, denying the older and sicker among us the care they need and even barring them from paying for it themselves. (Rationing based on income and price will be seen as immoral.)

And Obama will move to change permanently the partisan balance in America. He will move quickly to legalize all those who have been in America for five years, albeit illegally, and to smooth their paths to citizenship and voting. He will weaken border controls in an attempt to hike the Latino vote as high as he can in order to make red states like Texas into blue states like California. By the time he is finished, Latinos and African-Americans will cast a combined 30 percent of the vote. If they go by top-heavy margins for the Democrats, as they did in 2008, it will assure Democratic domination (until they move up the economic ladder and become good Republicans).

And he will enact the check-off card system for determining labor union representation, repealing the secret ballot in union elections. The result will be to raise the proportion of the labor force in unions up to the high teens from the current level of about 12 percent.

Finally, he will use the expansive powers of the Federal Communications Commission to impose “local” control and ownership of radio stations and to impose the “fairness doctrine” on talk radio. The effect will be to drive talk radio to the Internet, fundamentally change its economics, and retard its growth for years hence.

But none of these changes will cure the depression. It will end when the private sector works through the high debt levels that triggered the collapse in the first place. And, then, the large stimulus package deficits will likely lead to rapid inflation, probably necessitating a second recession to cure it.

So Obama’s name will be mud by 2012 and probably by 2010 as well. And the Republican Party will make big gains and regain much of its lost power.

But it will be too late to reverse the socialism of much of the economy, the demographic change in the electorate, the rationing of health care by the government, the surge of unionization and the crippling of talk radio.

Well done America, I hope you enjoy your decision. The key thing to remember from this editorial is the fact that your freedoms will be extinct in the near future. You will be bound to the federal government with no way out. Obama intends on molding Americans into pathetic, dependent drones. He doesn't have that far to go considering most already are. The only difference is that over the next four years he will make it so you HAVE to vote for him. As people are groomed to adopt Socialism and rely on there federal nanny the trap will be set. Vote for anyone else and you vote away that all important income. As a great man once said, Communism will never find its way back through the arena of ideas, but through the economic systems.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth, no matter what the Messiah has you believing.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

It Would be Funny, If It Wasn't so Tragic

So today marked the day where America has handed over its will to the Marxist regime. The day in which America has decided to abandon every virtue it was founded on. The day in which America has surrendered to the Socialist revolution. Yet, all the while I am being lectured to just "give him a chance." Excuse me while I vomit.

This shit I see today and have seen during the election started out as laughable but has transformed into a tragic comedy. This is the beginning of the end my friends, and it is petrifying. I know I know, stop with the drama you might say. "Your over reacting," you all say. Well I respond to these statements of ignorance by saying at least I HAVE a reaction. Just because I am not blinded by the angelic light exuded by the Messiah. Just because I do not follow lock step behind the great one as I chant his name like a zombie. So because I have a functioning brain and have not been effectively brainwashed, I am an over reacting wacko.

What really gets me about this whole thing is how the left is preaching "unity" now. How we "MUST" support the new Emperor. How we need to put "partisanship aside." How it is our "duty as Americans" to get behind our new Communist and Chief. I speak for the 50 million other real Americans who still have a functioning thought process when I say GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK! You have got to be kidding me. "Unity?" "Support?" You mean we should unite and support our new president like the Democrats did eight years ago? You mean we should "give him a chance," like the left did over the last eight years? Oh that's right, those things only apply when a licensed socialist takes the helm, I see. Time to put the "partisanship aside?" You mean like the left did as they attacked Bush every minute over the last eight years up until today at the inauguration? You mean put the partisanship aside like Palosi is as she rants about how she is going to bring the administration up on "war crimes"?

Since Michelle Obama seems to think that this country is "down right mean." Since she has such a low opinion of this country and has not been "proud to be an American until today." I wonder if she complained about all the idiots at the inauguration chanting derogatory things at Bush. Wouldn't you consider that a tad "mean" Michelle? Oh, that's right, that only applies to the right side of the aisle. My biggest question to everyone preaching "give him a chance," and "be happy for him" is WHY? Why should I be happy that we are embarking on a socialist revolution? Why should I be happy about a socialized economy? Why should I be happy about universal health care? Why should I be happy about a welfare tax plan? Why should I be happy about a weakened military, and a weakened stance on terror? Why should I be happy about a man that has the support of domestic and global terrorists? Why should I be happy about a man who advocates ideological fascism? Why should I be happy about a man who has the support of a racist, anti-American preacher? Why should I be happy about a man who intends on abandoning Israel as our long time allies? Why should I be happy about my country betraying the virtues and values of the founding fathers? Oh, that's right because he's black. So I guess blacks would turn out in brainwashed droves for Alan Keyes or Condaleeza Rice if they became president? Please. I know of people that relate to Hussein as a "celebrity" like figure. People have said they actually CRIED while watching the almighty one. I'm sorry, but I thought a president was supposed to be a president, not a rock star. This is by far the most nauseating thing of it all. Watching these blind idiots, chanting his name like Castro and Guevara, "crying" as they bathe in his angelic rays and godly words. Following him lock step, emotionally attached and intellectually impotent as he marches us off the cliff. When that happens, just remember that half of us did not vote for the "change" that is coming.

Yeah, I am thrilled, god bless the new President.

I'm Drew D. and that's the horrifying, tragic truth.