Wednesday, December 10, 2008

The Secret Socialist

So the Socialist agenda is slowly seeping it's way through prime time television. While this is nothing new, it is more obvious than ever. Admittedly the liberal agenda has indeed thrived through the media, just a tad more covertly. The "30 days" guy is one such example, The 30 Days on Minimum Wage, 30 Days with a Gun Nut, etc. These were just poorly disguised soap boxes used to sell liberalism. Then we have others throughout cable, like "Going Tribal." A show that promotes the "environmentalist" fascist agenda. They bound around the rain forests with no shoes screaming about the "rape of the land," and the "evil Westerners." Pretty much nothing new there either.

But the newest show I have seen takes sentiments right out of the Emperor's campaign slogans. Specifically, "Spread the wealth around," and "time to pitch in." The show is called The Secret Millionaire on Fox. Basically it is a show about a millionaire that goes under cover to live in a bad area of lower income. At the end he reveals what he truly is and then gives them money to help them. I will pause for the "awww's" and weeping. To the lay man this is just a sweet little program about how nice this millionaire is. To the skeptic and intelligent eye however, I see it for what it is.

In the intro to this show they actually say " A man that decides he needs to SPREAD THE WEALTH." As you watch this obscene display of conspicuous socialist advocacy it becomes unbearable. The man and his wife go to Watts, an extremely bad neighborhood in South Central L.A. While they do show how bad it is, they high light another aspect of the neighborhood I found interesting. They show citizens in the community talking about how "good the people are here." How they all try to "help each other." Then in obvious contrast they cut to the wife of the millionaire who complains about how that "isn't like her neighborhood." The theme? To show how cold the rich neighborhoods are, and how down to earth, civil, and warm Watts is. A reasonable comparison right?

The goal of this show is to promote the idea that the rich should apologize for their success. Not only to apologize, but to be self-loathing at the same time. The goal is to make those who are well off feel like bad people if they to do not either "spread their wealth," or PROMOTE THE THEORY of re-distribution. The point of the show is say that there are others out there that "deserve" the money more than you. And that the only way to facilitate this "economic justice" is to take from those who have and give to those who don't. We in economics and on planet Earth have a word for this theory, it is called Socialism. This is just yet another example of the enemy within infiltrating America. They are and have been slowly manipulating the public through these "cute" little shows. The sad part is, the public seems too stupid to figure out what is going on. Fox really took the "spread the wealth around," comments of the Furor to heart. Maybe soon they will come out with Who Wants to be a Communist?

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Teflon Elect

As many of you should already know, our new Furor (elect) seems to be carrying on the Chicago tradition. The tradition of corruption and political thuggery. This is now considered to be "accepted" by the mainstream Obamedia as simply "The Chicago Way." The more outrageous the facts get for the Furor the more they slip off him. In true Gotti fashion, and ironically in true Capone fashion, the Emperor can do no wrong. The true danger of the Teflon Elect is that no matter what happens, no matter what is proved, no matter what is said, he remains impervious and devine. Just look at the timeline and see how the facts didn't matter to the Obamedia or the "American" people.

First it was Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his "God Damn America," and "America's chickens have come home to roost," comments. Fact, Obama attended the church for twenty years. Fact, Obama contributed 24k/year to the church. Fact, this church preaches racism, anti-American rhetoric, and separatism. When asked if he (Obama) has ever witnessed such hate spouting over his twenty year tenure his response was "No." He claimed that he just used the church for his "political expediency." Even IF this was true, does it make it O.K. that he put aside any shred of decency to advance his career?

Then it was the connection between William Ayers and the Furor. Fact, Obama's political career was started in Ayers's living room. Fact, Ayers and Obama sat on the same community agitation boards in South Chicago for years. Fact, Ayers and Obama attend ceremonies in Venezuela to "honor" Hugo Chavez and applaud his radicalization of education. Fact, Obama supported a bill proposed by Ayers that promoted the radicalization of education here in the U.S. When asked about this connection Obama's response was; "He was just a guy in the neighborhood that I knew." Fact, Ayers was a leader of the domestic terrorist group "The Weather Underground," and bombed the Pentagon, Capital Building, and the NYC Police Dept. Fact, Ayers not only did not ever apologize for these actions but stated; "We didn't do enough." When asked how he (Obama) felt about these atrocities committed by this "guy he knew" he responded; "I was only eight years old at the time." Fact, he might have been eight when the bombings occurred, but he was well into his twenties and thirties while his career was launched from his living room and he worked with him on several boards.

Then there was the Tony Rezko situation. Fact, Obama considered Rezko a "friend and fundraiser." Fact, Obama was involved in a sweet heart deal with Rezko in which he purchased a piece of property for 300k below retail value. Fact, Obama and Rezko were involved in many other "shady" real estate deals throughout Chicago. Fact, Rezko was convicted of sixteen counts of corruption and bribery in 2008. When Obama was asked about these dealings with this scum bag his response was, "I worked on a real estate deal concerning the lot across the street, that's all." Fact, Obama lied point blank.

Now there is more scandal being exposed today with indictments on Illinois Governor Blagojevich. Fact, Blagojevich is on tape making deals in an attempt to auction off the empty Senate seat left by Obama. Fact, the central allegation is that the governor schemed to extort money and jobs for himself and his wife from the Obama transition team in exchange for naming Obama's preferred candidate (unnamed in the charges) to the open Senate seat. The complaint details Blagojevich's attempts to contact intermediaries to the transition, and in one case it shows him soliciting favors from a union official he identifies as an "emissary." When asked how he (Obama) felt about all of this he responded , "I had no idea what was going on." Fact, Obama was specifically mentioned on the FBI's wire taps as "that motherfucker." In the context that, Blagojevich would never just give away Obama's senate seat to whoever that "motherfucker" wanted just because he asked nicely. Meaning that he would not just give the seat away, but would most certainly sell it at the right price.

With all of these facts, and knowledge of Obama's character, does anyone seem to care? Does anyone even raise a single eye brow about these connections to criminals, domestic terrorists, and racists? Nope. It is my belief that people are so down right brainwashed that they ignore pretty much everything about our new Furor. The Obamazombies and the Obamedia refuse to report the news, and refuse to even attempt to contest the Emperor. Obama is truly the Teflon Elect, he can do no wrong and nobody cares if he does. As I have said before, the facts do not matter to the left, it is all about the agenda. The agenda that is moving forward at an incredible rate while nothing seems to stand in its way. I truly believe that as Obama takes hold as the almighty Messiah and people fall deeper into their Obacoma the country will fall. Let's hope I am wrong, but I doubt I am.

I'm Drew D. and that's the amazingling shocking truth.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Happy Tax Holidays?

When I first heard Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) explain his simple yet genius alternative to the bailouts I knew that it was far too smart to ever become a reality. However, he does pose a good point, politicians rely on their constituents. I defy you to find a person (a tax paying person) with even the slightest knowledge of basic economics that would reject this idea. If people really got behind this idea, and let their representatives know, Washington would listen. Even if begrudgingly, even if they themselves didn't fully back it, re-election is their life blood.

Sadly I feel that this plan will never get off the ground. Washington invariably chooses to avoid any idea with a hint of logic or common sense. Just how logical is Gohmert's plan? In my opinion it boils down to a few simple questions. Who do you trust more with your tax dollars? The career bureaucrats in Washington, or yourself? Do you feel that Washington has exemplified fiscal responsibility over the past decade? Do you feel that the answers to our economic woes can be found in the halls of Congress? Or do you have more faith in the responsibility of the tax payers? We the people are the ones that can get this economy back on track. Giving more hand outs to failing companies and to banks that just hoard the cash doesn't seem like the best idea to me. I trust the American people far more than I trust this give away orgy that is being orchestrated by "King" Paulson. He is absolutely right when he says "let the American people decide who gets bailed out." If they choose to buy an American car with their newly freed funds, then so be it. As consumer confidence builds and spending increases economic troubles will ease. This is far cheaper than the proposed Paulson plan, not to mention a thousand times more logical. Not only is Gohmert's plan more logical than Paulson's but it is more plausible that it would be effective. Throwing money at these problems while increasing the size of an already inept government is definitely not the solution.

I trust the American tax payer to be far more responsible with the funds that are being given away. I trust that the American tax payer can stimulate the economy better than the bureaucrats can. I believe in the power of the American tax payer, and I believe in the powers of free market Capitalism. I know that if the money is put in the hands of we citizens it will produce far better results than any corporate bailout ever could.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Gestapo Training

Have you all heard the news yet? To all of those "activists" roaming around college campuses stinking of bong water and patchouli who still have a man crush on our Emperor Obama, I would suggest you start paying attention to what is going on. For a group of people that absolutely despise the idea of a draft, or any sort of government mandated defense service, you sure picked a winner for President. It is called the Civil Defense Act

This whole thing sounds incredibly gestapo-Esq to me. Just pin the letters "OA" (Obama's Army) instead of "SS" on their uniforms and there you go. So we are to create a "civil" military that is "as well funded" and "as well trained" as the real military? I am normally not one for conspiracy theories but my mind has been running rampant with them lately. If you have studied Nazi Germany at all you can see the petrifying similarities between now and then. Fascism makes up the roots of liberalism, and Obama is the head of this snake. His followers march behind him lock step as if he is a super natural deity. These people literally worship the ground he walks on which will have dangerous results. Media control, and systematic brainwashing of the youth as seen here, are also scary signs. Emotion is what drives these followers, reason has been cast aside. That kind of blind faith of any leader has historically had disastrous consequences. Obama has been labeled as "extremely charismatic," and an "extraordinary speaker", so was Hitler. He has also been tagged as "highly manipulative," and "creepy." This is not me taking editorial license, these are the words of Democrats like these.

So now we have this "charismatic," "manipulative," leader who's followers march blindly in his wake driven by raw emotion. It is becoming trendy to hate the oppostion, to hate conservative ideas, hate being the key word. We have an impending censorship doctrine about to take effect that will drown out every last voice of opposition. The youth are being systematically brainwashed through our schools and "educators." We are about to have mandated "civil defense" camps used to defend the office of the President if by some chance the rest of the country starts to disagree. It fits perfectly into his grand plan. Disarm the average person in his home by eliminating the second amendment. Next, implement an armed force that will be required to fight for his cause. Leaving any remaining dissenters without any option of recourse. Is this situation starting to sound at all similar to any situation you have seen in the past? Germany, China, the Soviet Union perhaps? Just a thought.
Apparently I am not the only one who believes that there is good reason to be frightened about the appointment of our new Furor.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Can I Get Bailed Out Too?

Is this the beginning of the end for the American economy and capitalism as we know it? Is it the end of true conservatism in America as we know it? Of coarse I have to think this isn't the case, but a part of me isn't so sure. We are grooming a generation of people to believe that the government should baby sit them from cradle to grave. Entitlements have taken over the American spirit and the American work ethic. Suddenly everything has become a right. When I say everything I really mean everything. It is now considered a right to own a home, a right to get a college education, a right to money that others made. This entitlement get everything for nothing mentality is only the tip of the economic ice burg.
Bailouts, am I the only one that just had a huge question mark in their head when they first heard about this policy? Bailouts? What the hell is a bailout? You live or you die in a free market economy, either way if left alone it equals prosperity. The problem is we are slowly polluting and deconstructing the free market. It first started with the housing giants Fannie and Freddy because "we had to do it." We "had" to do it because the blame was placed squarely on their shoulders. While they surely are to blame for the majority of this quandary, nobody ever thought to blame the people. Those who applied for and accepted loans knowing full well they could never pay them back.
The bailouts of AIG, Freddy and Fannie have truly opened Pandora's box. Soon after this nauseating "rescue" package was constructed everybody came running with their hand out. Every state and many cities in the union began to demand "their share" of the funds. Now this free for all bailout orgy has expanded to the auto industry. We are being told once again that we "have to" bail out these failed auto companies. Let me just stick my neck out here and say HELL NO! Where does it end, if we bail out every single institution and company that faces extinction, where do we draw the line? Fiscal responsibility is something I feel we have completely abandoned as a virtue throughout America and more importantly the government.
We can not afford this people, we truly can not. Some one, some where is going to have to pay this bill and it simply can't be done. So every time a company runs themselves into the ground through poor management and corruption we have to rescue them? This is a slippery slope that we are presented with. Once people see that being "bailed out" has become a viable option the begging will never end.
Why do think that the major proponents of this "bailout" policy are members of the loony left i.e. Palosi, Reed, etc? They advocate this for the reason that many seem to ignore. The convenient little bi-product of these government bail outs is the transfer of ownership. Once these companies accept this charity they virtually sell their souls (ownership.) For those of you who don't know, this is called socialism, the favored system of the left. The biggest condition of these bail outs is the fact that once they go through they have to do exactly what the government wants. This entire policy is so ludicrous I almost don't have words for it. So let's take institutions and companies that have been run into the ground because of the government and give them complete OWNERSHIP of them, this sounds like a good plan. These pseudo-governmental firms like Fannie and Freddy were destroyed because of left wing corruption, so now the government controls them absolutely. The auto companies are failing because of insane trade regulations and "environmentalist" bullying so now we are about to hand the reigns over to the government. This is the equivalent of making the worst employee in your business the boss of it all. Say you owned a restaurant and you had a bus boy that was absolutely awful. He slowed down the service, left the tables dirty, and was stealing from you to boot. So instead of firing him when you come across financial difficulty you decide to step down as owner and hand it all over to the bus boy to help you out of the hole.
This welfare nation that we have created is a beast that's hunger can never be satisfied. Socialism has been sold to people hook line and sinker, and it will be the end of us. Financial responsibility has been tossed out the window by everyone across the board. From the individual citizen that has to buy his own house and pay his own way through school, to the corporations that have destroyed themselves. With this abandonment of responsibility through this adoption of entitlement the American spirit is dying. Democracy will come to an end once people start to exploit the benefits sucked from the public treasury. This welfare mentality will have a snow ball effect as it did in France. People will continue to vote for the person that guarantees them more and more benefits from said treasury. As this person will more than likely be a Democrat the progression to a France like socialist nation will be inevitable.
My biggest fear is that conservatives in Washington today believe that this is the wave of the future. They will start to pander to the people by offering the very same liberal policies that we have fought so hard against. Nothing infuriates me more than seeing all of these "conservatives," crying about the election saying that we lost because we aren't liberal enough. Saying that we need to become MORE liberal in order to get elected. Are you nuts? You really believe this while you sit there and call yourself conservative? This is NOT a center-left country, it is most certainly center-right, and if you don't agree with that then please go sign your name to the Dem list. As we distinguish ourselves from the socialist left over the next four years we must go back to our conservative roots. We must re-establish our values of financial responsibility and find our own super stars that will bring the TRUE conservative message to the masses. Once people see what they really voted for and start to experience it's implications they will realize that capitalism, free markets, and essentially the conservative movement is the only answer for a prosperous country.
Let us please remember that it was "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Not , "Ask not what you can do for your country, but what your country can do for you."
Let us also remember that once you give the government the power to give you everything, you give it the power to take everything away.
I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Thursday, November 6, 2008


All hail, All hail, bow to the Emperor lest you be punished. Get ready America, the Messiah has taken his throne and his minions are in place. As I said before the election, people are too stupid to realize what they just voted for. In some sick way I am happy and look forward to the years to come. America wanted Socialism, so let them experience Socialism. They wanted a friend of the enemy in the White House, so let them see the result. Unfortunately Americans' often need to learn the hard way that they made a mistake. Let's just hope that the damage done can in some way be reversed.

Why did America choose to blindly follow this man and his party off the cliff? How could America be so ignorant you might ask? It was a simple decision made by simple people. In the minds of the voters the decision panned out like this; Times are bad, Republicans in Congress, Republican President, they are to blame, time to switch teams, they will produce the "change." As ill-conceived this logic may be, despite how down right dangerous it is, it is how they think. Well, you will absolutely get the "change" America, no doubt about it.

Who's to blame for this horrible turn of events you might ask? That's easy, it is the fault of the Republicans and a horrible Republican candidate. If there is one good thing that has come out of this tragedy that is Obama it is the fact that Republicans are forced to re-group. This is the wake up call to all those pathetic excuses for conservatives in Washington. If Republicans actually ACTED like Republicans during the last eight years we might have stood a chance. We spent like liberals and dragged our feet like liberals, so how can we expect Americans' to distinguish us from the left? It is time for the Washington right to go back to their roots of conservatism. It is time to show the stark contrast between capitalists and socialists. It is a shame that we had to be backed into a corner to realize just how far we have strayed from our principles. It is even more sad that we will HAVE to fight socialism as it will be forced upon us every day for the next four years. Thank god it isn't a filibuster proof congress, so we might be able to get in their way enough to slow them down.

If we make it to the next election, I am optimistic. America will see exactly what the Democrats are, and more importantly what Obama is. He will not be able to win re-election using the same moronic strategies and catch phrases he did this time. No more "change" signs will be waving, no "yes we can" crap. He won't be a change and everyone will have already seen what "they can" do. The Bush card has been played to extinction, so there goes a golden key for the Democrats. They can't blame every last thing on the Republicans because there aren't any. All the blame rests on their shoulders. America will finally come down off their Obama high and realize that the miracles they were promised weren't delivered. During the next four years it is the Republicans opportunity to show the country just what conservatism is and is not.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Vote Obama........Or Else

O.K. folks, let me lay it out for all of you who are just overwhelmed with this election mumbo jumbo. What we are being told by the left and the rest of the Communist wing of America is that if we don't bow down and let Obama waltz into the White House that there will be hell to pay. In other words, it's an attempt to extort the nation. No greater example of liberal thuggery if there ever was one.
The point is, if you DON'T stand down America, and you get in the chosen one's way, it will be your ass. Just shut up and take it, we know what's best for you, is the message from the left. How dare you challenge the Messiah Joe the Plumber? How dare ANYONE challenge the great one? Coming from a group of people that insist on calling the right a bunch of fascists, this seems to be a tad hypocritical. In fact, this entire Communist campaign for Obama defines fascism. Dominating the media, destroying decenters, and coercing the public, yeah, sounds pretty synonymous with the "F" word to me. Hitler came to power the exact same way Obama will. In fact Hitler, Obama, and the entire leftist party are quite similar. All represent the Socialist party, all promote ideological fascism, and both came to power through media domination and propaganda machines. Crazy statement? Too bad, I haven't been silenced, YET. I say yet, because the fascism of Obama is soon to come. Just wait until the "Fairness Doctrine" gets through. In which talk radio is silenced, Fox News is shut down, and every avenue of descent is successfully squashed. We can't have people speaking out against the Emperor now can we?
The biggest hypocrisy of this entire campaign is based on something you all might have been hearing a lot about lately, race. Using the "racist" tactic is a very old trick of the left. They use this in defence of virtually every issue that has legitimate opposition. Opposing anything from immigration policy to affirmative action will automatically brand you as a racist. However, not supporting Obama is the most popular reason for them to give you this label. If you question the fact that this guy is the most dangerous, inexperienced, Communist wacko ever, your just a racist. Let me tell you who is racist, black people. Before you all flip out hear me out. 96% of all blacks are voting for Obama, I'm sure their love for his policies are their only motivation. Do you think if 96% of white people were voting for McCain that they all wouldn't be labeled redneck racists? Do you think that if all whites threatened to riot if McCain didn't get elected there wouldn't be public outrage? My assertion that blacks are far more racist than whites is not justified by simply this fact. I constantly hear black people refer to whites as "that white girl," or, "that white dude." So your saying if I walk around saying "black girl" this and "black guy" that, that nobody would say anything? If I gave a white man a job over a black man even though the black man was far more qualified I would be racist. But if I give the far less qualified black man a job over the white man, I'm a tolerant, open-minded liberal. You can't find me one black comedian that can do a set without at least one white joke. All too many base their entire show on a black/white comparison. So if a white comedian was up there making fun of black people nobody would say anything? I hear more hateful remarks about white people than I do anything else, but that's considered "humorous." Racism is wrong no matter what color the person is who espouses it. Obama is the biggest supporter of playing the race card. He can't go one second without "reminding" us that he is black. This coming from a man who is the most racist of all. "White mans greed runs a world in need," I believe the quote is. His wife is an overtly racist separatist as well, if you read her college thesis you will understand.
So make sure you Vote Obama, because if you don't blacks will riot. Just obey, and accept the change that we all need so badly.
I'm Drew D. and that's the truth, and I guess I can now be called racist.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Liberals DO Hate America

Unlike Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C) I do NOT apologize for saying what he has already said. He is now trying to back track and say "he didn't mean it that way." Well I DO mean it that way, because it is a fact. Anyone with a sliver of brain power should recognize that liberals not only hate America, but brag about it. Hating this country is one of their party platforms for god sake. Their hatred is what fuels their sick, twisted, and treasonous ideologies. Wrong you say? Crazy am I? Well let's take a peak at what the Emperor has to say on the subject shall we?

From Sunday's televised "Meet the Press" Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. General Bill Ginn USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain why he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. The General also stated to the Senator that according to the United States Code Title 36, Ch. 10, Sec. 171....During rendition of the National Anthem when the flag is displayed all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. At the very least, "Stand and Face It."

Senator Obama Live on Sunday states: "As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides," Obama said. "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American Flag is a symbol of OPPRESSION."

"And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing. If that were our anthem, then I might salute it."

"My wife disrespects the flag for many personal reasons. Together she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past, many years ago."

Wow, is all I have to say, for once I might be speechless, but not quite. Yes, Lord Obama I understand how wearing that flag pin could lead people to believe your "TAKING SIDES." God forbid, I for one would never want other countries to think that our PRESIDENT is taking OUR side. To WHOM is the flag considered a "symbol of oppression." Oh, that's right, the same people that live in caves and have your picture on their walls.

This is just the beginning ladies and gentlemen, if you think this is bad wait until he's elected. He will change the Pledge of Allegiance, change the Flag, change the National Anthem. Change it all to re-build it in his own "glorious" image. Maybe something like THIS or THIS would be more appropriate for a National Anthem. Laugh now perhaps, but see who's crying in a few months.

I'm Drew D. and that's the HORRIBLE, SCARY, AND INFURIATING truth.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

The Third Party

What a Libertarian Is - and Is Not
by Sam Wells

A libertarian is a person - any person - who consistently advocates individual freedom and consistently opposes the initiation of the use of coercion by anyone upon the person or property of anyone else for any reason. (Coercion is here defined as any action taken by a human being against the will or without the permission of another human being with respect to his or her body or property. This includes murder, rape, kidnapping, assault, trespassing, burglary, robbery, arson and fraud.) Some libertarians (such as the late Robert LeFevre) not only oppose all forms of initiatory coercion, but also the use of retaliatory coercion (revenge or criminal justice). The vast majority of libertarians, however, maintain that physical force used in self-defense or defense of one's family or property is fully justifiable.

But, all libertarians, by definition, at least oppose the initiatory use of coercion. They support the rational principle of the individual human rights of life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. This means that each individual has the right to keep what he earns for himself and his family, and this includes the right to use, trade, sell, give away, or dispose of his property as he sees fit. A person who violates the rights of others by initiating coercion, violence, or fraud against them forfeits his right to be left alone by government and may be arrested, charged, tried, and imprisoned, deported or executed if convicted (depending on the nature of his or her crimes). The basic, proper function of lawful government is therefore limited to protecting these rights of the peaceful individual from criminals and foreign aggression, and in not violating these rights itself, for if government is allowed to go beyond this legitimate function and itself initiates force in violation of the rights of peaceful citizens, it necessarily contradicts the only rational justification for its own existence by acting criminally itself.

Real libertarians take individual rights seriously - seriously enough to consistently uphold them against the initiation of the use of force by anyone (including government) for any reason. This means that government must be bound by the policy of "laissez faire" - which means that government has no business coercively interfering with the lives of peaceful (non-coercive) citizens in their private affairs and voluntary (market) relationships.

Libertarians may or may not approve of some of the things that some people may do in private or in voluntary relations, but whatever their own code of personal moral conduct is, they do not seek to ban any private or voluntary activities by the use of force, including the force of government action. To do so would be to violate the very principle of individual rights of person and property, and thereby undercut any rational argument in favor of freedom or defense of the free-market system. Those exception makers and outright coercive busy-bodies in our midst (referred to as "interventionists" or "statists" by libertarians) who do want to abandon government by principle and instead put Whim in charge of the use of legal coercion are the people who help set the stage for arbitrary and capricious governmental tyranny - leading in the direction of totalitarian dictatorship.

Libertarians Are Not Conservatives

Libertarians are not "conservatives"; libertarians are radicals (principled advocates) for individual freedom and responsibility - and the pure free-market private-enterprise economic system which would result from a consistent application of that principle. A "conservative" on the other hand is one who wishes to preserve the status quo. The status quo in America today is the semi-socialist, semi-fascist mixed-economy welfare-state - a system inimical to personal freedom and responsibility. Libertarians do not support such a system, and oppose any and all measures to expand it while favoring the total repeal of interventionist laws and regulatory agencies.

Conservatives of the William F. Buckley or William Bennett variety are generally more concerned with imposing "order" than with allowing freedom. Although they often (and rightly) complain that government has got "too big" and too meddlesome in our lives, on some specific issues they themselves favor using the political power of government to legislate and enforce their view of morality upon the populace in "the national interest" or for the "social good." William Bennett, for example, opposes the legalization and/or decriminalization of the sale and use of heroin and cocaine, and he continues to support the no-win "War on Drugs" which is causing violence to escalate in our society. Libertarians, on the other hand, realize that "enforced morality" (in such personal matters) is a contradiction in terms; without freedom of choice there can be no moral responsibility and personal growth.

Libertarians also perceive that freedom brings about a more complex, dynamic and harmonious order in society (co-ordinated by the market price mechanism) than any static view of order imposed by central political planning and regulations of our non-coercive behaviors.
Libertarians are for individual freedom - and this includes the freedom of people to do some things that we and other people may disapprove of. A person should be free (from coercive interference) to do what he pleases with his own life and property, as long as he does not violate (through coercive interference) the same right of other peaceful persons to do what they want with their lives and properties. (The second clause is logically implied in the first.) Libertarians do not oppose non-coercive persuasion, educational efforts, private advertising campaigns, organized boycotts, or even social ostracism as means of trying to effect changes in the private behavior of others. (Many people have stopped smoking tobacco in recent years partly as a result of education and persuasion by friends and family members.) What libertarians do oppose is the attempt by anyone (individuals or government officials) to impose their own views of "fairness" or personal morality on others through the initiation of the use of coercion, by either personal violence or political legislation and governmental action. This principled position sets libertarians apart from conservatives as well as other non-libertarians.

Libertarians Are Not Welfare-State "Liberals"

Libertarians are not to be confused with the so-called "civil libertarians" which typify the membership and leadership of the American Civil Liberties Union. It is true that the ACLU has come to the defense of freedom of speech for certain minorities (e.g., nazis, communists, and anarchists) and this is commendable - but the podium has often been at taxpayers' expense, which is a "no-no" from the real libertarian perspective. Many "civil libertarians" believe that some people have a "right" to violate the rights of others; they claim there is a "right to a job" or a "right" to welfare payments or a "right" to "free education" or a "right" to free child care - all at the expense of the people (usually the taxpayers) who are forced to pay for these so-called "rights." Real libertarians are for true freedom, not "freedom" at the forced expense of others. The only obligation that true rights impose on persons is of a negative kind: not to interfere with the rights of other people - i.e., to refrain from the initiation of the use of coercion. This is the core principle of libertarianism and is sometimes called the 'Non-Aggression Axiom'.

Welfare-state "liberals" and "civil libertarians" speak of "rights" of people as members of specially privileged groups, such as "women's rights" or "gay rights" or "rights of the handicapped" or even so-called "animal rights"! Real libertarians know that there are only individual rights, not group rights. There is no such thing as "gay rights" or "black rights" or "white rights" or left-handed Martian rights. Government must not be used to dish out special privileges to any group for any reason, since government cannot give anyone anything unless it takes it away from others by force, thereby violating their rights. There can be no such thing as a "right" to violate the rights of others.
No doubt there are some well-intentioned ACLU members who do promote true civil liberties and uphold human rights; however, the ACLU has not come to the defense of the rights of school children whose freedom is being violated daily by compulsory attendance laws and the tyranny of Federally-ordered forced busing. Nor do I know of any case in which the ACLU has defended the constitutional rights of businessmen who are being harassed by OSHA agents and other bureaucrats, or hounded by such arbitrary and subjective laws as the antitrust acts. Indeed, many "civil libertarians" seem callously insensitive to the victims of crime and legal plunder - while they defend known criminals from justice.

Because of their consistent adherence to the principle of individual rights, libertarians are the only true defenders of liberty -- civil or otherwise. Real libertarians understand that freedom of speech and other civil liberties depend on the sanctity of private property - not its violation by anti-discrimination laws and other forms of government intervention.

Libertarians Are Not for Unlimited Majority Rule

Libertarians are not democrats. While majority rule may or may not be as good as any other mechanism for selecting the men and women who administer the offices of government, libertarians deny that anyone or any group has a right to rule over other peaceful (non-coercive) citizens - whether they are in the majority or minority at any given time. If stealing is wrong for an individual to do, it is still wrong when conducted by a large group or by a majority vote. The number of people involved in an act does not change the rightness or wrongness of the act. There is no magic number that turns an individual wrong into a collective right. In a libertarian republic, the basic policy of government (i.e., laissez faire) is set by reference to fundamental principle -- the principle of individual rights -- and not determined by a show of hands. Libertarians uphold the right of the peaceful individual to self-ownership and private property against any who would violate this right - even a majority.
Libertarians Are Not Anarchists

Libertarians are not anarchists.

While it is true that some individuals favor a political system of competing vigilante committees, and refer to this position as "anarcho-capitalism" (a view formerly held by libertarian economist Murray Rothbard), this is a confusing misnomer based on an apparent failure to clearly distinguish between the nature of market institutions (which do not involve the use of coercion at all, either initiatory or retaliatory) and the nature of coercive entities (criminal or legal). Actually, libertarianism rests on the concepts of individualism, self-ownership, private property, & voluntary (market) exchange. Classical anarchism not only opposed the political state, but also some voluntary organizations of which it disapproved. Most importantly, true anarchists opposed private property - without which no voluntary relationships are possible. Today's libertarians are in the classical liberal tradition of Algernon Sidney, John Locke, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Edmund Burke, Herbert Spencer, and Frederic Bastiat - not the anarchist tradition of Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.

Libertarians Are Not Pragmatists

Libertarians do not advocate freedom or the free-market economy merely because "it works" (which it does better than any other system); they support it as the only non-coercive and just system - the system in which people are free to deal with one another on a voluntary basis as traders (exchangers of goods and services) instead of as masters and slaves - or as privileged class and exploited host. Others advocate government by whim. Libertarians adhere to certain principles, and without the guidance of principles and standards, all that is left is pragmatic expediency and the tyranny of government by whim. One might say that libertarians are "idealists" in the popular sense of that word; after all, libertarians stand for certain ideals - goals to strive for (e.g., less government intervention, more individual freedom and moral responsibility, free markets, etc.). Because libertarianism is based on man's nature and the nature of reality, it is the most practicable social system.

Libertarians are practical idealists.

Now you tell me, do you think that this party should have a legitimate role in American politics? I believe that as the two major parties become more and more synonymous Americans will look toward alternatives. I don't consider the "Green" Party a viable alternative, for the record. That is just a party that doesn't think the left is left enough. You might say in response to this that Libertarians are right of right. While this is true to a limited extent, they do not share many conservative policies. The Libertarian Party is quite unique and deserves serious consideration. After America falls into a quasi-Cuba with Emperor Obama at the helm, eyes will open, I hope.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

The RED white and blue

Could it be that more than half of Americans actually support the impending socialization of our nation? Could they really be ASKING for this great nation to go the way of the Soviet Union? Considering what I have seen and heard throughout this election period I would lean toward the affirmative. However my heart still tells me that once the wool is pulled from their feeble eyes they won't be so receptive.

Never before have I seen the Communist agenda be so widely accepted and promoted in America. We all knew that this philosophy is the love child of the liberals but it has recently run rampant. Not only is their Presidential candidate (soon to be Emperor) the supreme leader of the Red party, but it is considered a political PLUS to be so. As much as Hussein lies and manipulates the American people about his true intentions he is still quite forthcoming. That is the truly scary thing about all of this. The fact that he is BRAGGING about changing the fabric of this nation in order to liken it to Cuba is shocking. What is even more shocking is the fact that people seem to love this idea. Am I lost? Where in the hell am I? Seriously, I really thought I lived in America, but lately it feels like I am living in the middle of 19th century USSR.

Barry and Biden have promoted the Communist agenda from day one and their numbers just get better and better. EVERYTHING they stand for and wish to implement reeks of collectivism. From stating that taxes are "patriotic," to saying "we need to spread your wealth around." Crazy, you might be saying to yourself. I'm just a crazy right wing radical nut right? No way is Barry Hussein in any way connected to the Communist Party right? Well let's see, take a gander at some of what these people had to say.

“Of course, as we all know, Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist and he had a very good understanding of the underlying source of problems which all too often goes unstated and unchallenged and remains hidden because of the high fear-factor level in this country; I am referring to capitalism―a thoroughly rotten system. Frank Marshall Davis also understood through his thorough studies of the situation that socialism provided the only workable alternative to capitalism.”

Just add Davis to the long list of all-star mentors of Barry Hussein. It doesn't end their, hear is another sparkling Osama recommendation.

"Notably, the labor movement has stepped up its independent mobilization for this election. It is leading an unprecedented campaign to educate and unify its ranks to elect the nation’s first African American president. Last week, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka told the Steelworkers convention that there is “no evil that’s inflicted more pain and more suffering than racism — and it’s something we in the labor movement have a special responsibility to challenge.”
If Obama’s candidacy represented nothing more than the spark for this profound initiative to unite the working class and defeat the pernicious influence of racism, it would be a transformative candidacy that would advance progressive politics for the long term.
The struggle to defeat the ultra-right and turn our country on a positive path will not end with Obama’s election. But that step will shift the ground for successful struggles going forward.
One thing is clear. None of the people’s struggles — from peace to universal health care to an economy that puts Main Street before Wall Street — will advance if McCain wins in November.
Let’s keep our eyes on the prize.
That’s right. The
Communist Party Of The United States wants to elect Barack Hussein Obama as our President"

Makes you want to go pull that blue (RED) lever doesn't it? How inspiring, I can hardly contain myself. Is Barry a Communist? Well is the sky blue, is water wet, is beer delicious? Of coarse. Individual psychos like the previous gem I quoted are not the only Red supporters of Barry. Everyone from Fidel Castro to Hugo Chavez are on the Barry bandwagon. Not to mention every radical Islamic faction across the world having his picture on their cave walls. With all this support why shouldn't we vote for him?

Hussein is finally calling his "tax plan" for what it is, Communism. Just HERE, he decided to explain to this man that "spreading the wealth around is good for everyone." Hmm, so it's "NOT" punishing your success if the government takes away 75% of your money for doing so? Geez, I wonder what he DOES think punishment is. Oh wait, I know, punishment is making those who do nothing, produce nothing, and contribute nothing, HAVE NOTHING. Sorry sir, your much to "rich," you have plenty, it's time to be "patriotic." Which means I'm robbing you, but you should feel good about it. I will put it where it "belongs." Great plan Mr. Messiah, you should advise Castro when your not busy taking over America.

How full of shit is Barry Hussein really. This guy would lie about what he had for breakfast. Saying that he is "worried about factory jobs going over seas." COME ON! Gee, I wonder WHY jobs are going over seas and will continue at record breaking rates once his slimy ass gets in. It's because, Mr. Emperor, when you TAX THE HELL out of those "evil corporations" you speak of and FORCE them to conform to every regulation under the sun, they LEAVE. They either leave, or they lay off thousands, both of which are super things to happen in an ailing economy.

However, through all this gloom and doom there is a shimmer of hope. Hope that lies in a man named "Joe the Plumber." Here is a regular guy, a man that is trying to pursue the American dream. A man that has worked 12 hrs. a day, seven days a week for years in the hopes of buying the business he works for. To provide a better life for his family, to aspire to achieve things his parents could only dream of. But does Barry think he should have his dream? Sure, after he pays his dues to everyone down the street. Like the people that don't work, don't pay taxes, and don't produce anything, sounds reasonable. I love Joe, he should run for office, finally a man who speaks for me. He is PROUD of this country and tired of the leftist "apologize for America" BS. He is tired of Socialist programs like Social Security and Barry's proposed Sick Care. He recognizes that this re-distribution of wealth plan is a slippery slope. EXACTLY JOE! Just wait until Barry decides that 100k/year is "rich enough." Or even 40k, or how about just above the poverty line? That would be "good for everyone" don't you think? And it's not like Hussein wants taxes to go towards National Security, or Public Works (REAL public works, like roads not ACORN.) He wants taxes to go from the pockets of those who earned it to those who didn't. Take it from those who create jobs, create prosperity, contribute to society and the economy, and put into those who don't even PAY taxes. The goal is to make everyone the same, the Communist goal. Everyone makes the same, and everyone lives the same, inspiring philosophy isn't it?

We can only hope that the true Americans in this country stand up and fight this impending Communist Revolution before it's too late.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Monday, October 13, 2008

The Employee Coercion Act

The cleverly named "Employee Free Choice Act" will be one of the great "changes" to the workforce that the Messiah will implement once he has taken his thrown. This beautiful little bill not only strips an employees rights, but it makes them a target. The primary goal of this act is to convert the secret-ballot method of voting for and organizing unions to a public "card check" method. This method would mean doing away with the anonymity of union voting and replacing it with signed cards that are publicly viewed. Please read the act carefully as it is well outlined in the Heritage Foundation article.This part is key:

To protect American workers, Congress should:

Protect workers' privacy during organizing drives and guarantee every worker the right to vote in a private-ballot election;

Ensure that workers hear from both sides dur­ing an organizing drive and have time to reflect on their choice so they can make an informed and considered decision; and

Protect the right of workers and employers to bargain collectively without having government officials unilaterally impose employment con­tracts on them.

The Employee Free Choice Act would strip workers of their fundamental rights and leave them more vulnerable to pressure than before.

This is absolutely correct and should be highlighted. Ask yourself; Why would unions be so adamant about making the votes of employees public? For a variety of reasons, one, it allows them to target those who have voted against it, and two, hinders employees from voting their true opinion. It is a fact that without privacy and outside influence a person will often vote ingenuously. And why not, with severe intimidation and threats resulting from a "no" vote on unions you might do the same. Union thuggery is no secret to anyone with half a brain (liberals excluded of coarse). With these public ballots they can target a dissenter within the employee ranks and proceed with the coercion, or, "persuasion." They will harass, intimidate, even go to the persons home in order to help them "see the light."

This is just one of the initial steps in implementing the Emperors second coming of the Workers Revolution. There will be more sure to come, so stay tuned for more exciting developments in the Messiah's war on capitalism!

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Obama Loves Kids

We all know that the Messiah is truly a man of the people. A champion of the working man, a true humanitarian. Well as long as you don't consider a new born infant a "human" I guess that's true. For those of you who don't know infanticide is the practice of killing a child that was "supposed" to have been previously aborted. In other words if the abortion is botched and god forbid the baby is born anyway, the hospital "finishes the job," so to speak. Hear the horrifying details and eye witness testimony from a nurse that worked at one of these hospitals.
This is just more confirmation that these people are absolutely sick and need to be stopped at all costs. There is zero difference between Emperor Obama and Kim Jong Il in terms of "birth control" policies. Both are clear cut murderers and mad men. The most disturbing part about the whole thing was the crowd that cheered and applauded as Obama spoke to the masses at Unplanned Parenthood. What more evidence do we need to prove just how twisted and deranged the left is? How people can stand by and APPLAUD the murdering of new borns is totally beyond me. It should have come as no surprise to me, considering this is a man that believes a child is a "punishment" in the first place. I just thought that anyone with a slice of soul in their body that hasn't been dissolved by liberalism might just have a SLIGHT problem with infanticide. I guess I over estimated them, again, not surprised.
Sadly ironic considering Obama and his ilk will be the first to call our fine troops "baby killers."
I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

The Speech Every American Should Hear

(click here to listen)

Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. You won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. Men, all this stuff you've heard about America not wanting to fight, wanting to stay out of the war, is a lot of horse dung. Americans traditionally love to fight. All real Americans, love the sting of battle. When you were kids, you all admired the champion marble shooter, the fastest runner, the big league ball players, the toughest boxers ... Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in Hell for a man who lost and laughed.

That's why Americans have never lost and will never lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans. Now, an army is a team. It lives, eats, sleeps, fights as a team. This individuality stuff is a bunch of crap. The Bilious bastards who wrote that stuff about individuality for the Saturday Evening Post, don't know anything more about real battle than they do about fornicating. Now we have the finest food and equipment, the best spirit, and the best men in the world. You know ... My God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're going up against. My God, I do. We're not just going to shoot the bastards, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun bastards by the bushel.

Now some of you boys, I know, are wondering whether or not you'll chicken out under fire. Don't worry about it. I can assure you that you'll all do your duty. The Nazis are the enemy. Wade into them. Spill their blood, shoot them in the belly. When you put your hand into a bunch of goo, that a moment before was your best friends face, you'll know what to do. Now there's another thing I want you to remember. I don't want to get any messages saying that we are holding our position. We're not holding anything, we'll let the Hun do that. We are advancing constantly, and we're not interested in holding onto anything except the enemy. We're going to hold onto him by the nose, and we're going to kick him in the ass. We're going to kick the hell out of him all the time, and we're going to go through him like crap through a goose.

Now, there's one thing that you men will be able to say when you get back home, and you may thank God for it. Thirty years from now when you're sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee, and he asks you, What did you do in the great World War Two? You won't have to say, Well, I shoveled shit in Louisiana. Alright now, you sons of bitches, you know how I feel. I will be proud to lead you wonderful guys into battle anytime, anywhere. That's all.

General George S. Patton, Jr.
3rd Army Speech - England.
31 MAY 1944 - 6th Armored Division

One of the greatest men in history, and one of the best speeches ever delivered. All too many Americans have forgotten the values that this country was built on. More importantly we have lost sight of the very values that men like Patton defended with honor and pride. The values that embody the spirit of America that seems to be fleeting day by day. If Patton ever heard the leftist drivel of today he would spin in his grave. Now more than ever every American needs to be reminded of what we ONCE stood for.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Friday, October 3, 2008

An American Miracle

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a......CONSERVATIVE Hollywood Film??? I never thought I would see the day that a movie with conservative leanings would EVER be given the green light in Hollywood. The new movie, An American Carol not only got the green light but is actually getting advertising time. Actors including Kevin Farley, Jon Voight, Kelsey Grammar, Dennis Hopper, Leslie Nielson and even Bill O'Reilly take the task of exposing the radical Hollywood left for the wackos they are. I personally can't wait to see this film, and I really can't wait for Michael Moore and Rosey O'Donnel to see it. How do you think the fair and balanced critics will view this movie? I'm already laughing.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

The Woman That Can Do No Right

After last nights debate it was quite obvious that Sarah Palin is more than qualified to be the VP of the United States. In fact, she is more qualified than the great Obama to be President. However, the ObamaMania media didn't quite see it that way, what a shocker. They accused her of doing everything from making a "prepared speech," to not "having enough facts." I'm sorry, I suppose we were watching different debates. The debate I saw showed me a confident, well informed, and quite humorous Palin. If anyone sounded like they were giving prepared mini-speeches it was clearly (Say it ain't so) Joe Biden. Palin got the better of Joe Biden on more than one occasion, I know it, and Biden knows it.

The standards for the ObamaMania media in terms of determining Biden's "victory" have become lower and lower. They had to be low in order to blind themselves to Palin's performance. With all their heart they prayed for Palin's destruction at the podium. They hoped to see the "bumpkin" Palin make a fool of her self as she clung to her guns and religion. When Palin went on to be nothing short of impressive it infuriated and boggled the leftist Nazi's. You could visibly see the likes of Chris Mathews and others scramble for any negative comment they could pin to Palin. Their plan of attack? To say Biden won because he had a "harder job" to do than Palin did. According to these slow witted libs they thought that Biden had to prove he was qualified to be President, and all Palin had to do was "show a pulse." Umm, last I checked it was the Obamedia that said Palin wasn't a good VP pick because she would LIKELY have to be President one day. Not only that, Palin had to do much more than "show a pulse." She had the ridiculous task of cancelling out the horrendous characterizations of her in the past weeks. A task which she took on and made easy work of.

In other words the litmus test for determining the winner of the past two debates is as follows: In debate #1 it was deemed a "tie", therefore Obama wins. In debate #2 Palin won, so it was deemed another "tie," so guess who wins, Biden. Anyone see a theme here? It seems that no matter what anyone on the Mccain/Palin ticket does it's a lost cause. Sarah Palin could cure cancer, achieve world peace, pave the roads with gold and still be crucified by the left for being a hunter.

The Meatballs that Mccain/Palin watched Float over the Plate:

While Mccain's first performance was satisfactory and Palin's quite impressed me I have my complaints. Mccain passed up a serious opportunity to illustrate to the American people the connection between the Democrats and the financial crisis. He also passed up the chance to call out Obama on any of the thousand lies that were said. Like making a reference to Harry Reid's "The war is lost, the surge has failed" comment when Obama claimed "Nobody is saying the war is lost." Or by calling Obama on the fact that he has NEVER advocated oil drilling like he said he does in the debate.

However Palin missed the biggest opportunity of all. Biden had the audacity to claim that Bush's policies have been an unmitigated failure. That we are far worse off after eight years of his "dangerous" world view. BS! Palin should have proclaimed (maybe not in those words) but along those lines. A FAILURE MR. Biden? Really? Preventing one SINGLE attack since 2001 from happening when it was almost inevitable is not what I would call a failure. Those "failed polices" are what kept your miserable ass safe for the last seven years Mr. Biden.

She also should have addressed the Socialist attacks on Capitalism by Obama/Biden. When Obama/Biden said "the fundamentals of our economy are NOT sound." that they are "what got us in this mess." Mccain or Palin should have again cried BS! "Fundamentals not sound?" Really Mr. Messiah? Really Mr. Biden? The market was up and running 48 hrs after 9/11, when the economy should have and WOULD have tanked in any other country ours was resilient. And WHY was it resilient? Because the FUNDAMENTALS ARE SOUND YOU LIBERAL PEE BRAINS!

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Go Bill Go !!

I have not been the biggest Bill O'Reilly fan in the past but he has gotten back into my good graces. I respect Bill O'Reilly, he is a good radio host and an excellent writer. However, I have gotten a little tired of his "centrist," "play both sides" method of presenting the news. At times he struck me as just too moderate for my liking. But today on The Factor he was a credit to the sentiments of not only conservatives but all Americans.

Finally somewhat let that schmuck Frank have it. Finally someone called him on his key role in this disaster, and it being on national TV was just icing on the cake. I love it when O'Reilly takes off that "moderate" mask and gets mad like the rest of us. That little weasel Frank tried and tried to pin this on everyone else under the sun and evade ANY sort of responsibility and Bill called him on it. Frank's response was of typical liberal fashion. Blame the Republicans, blame Bush, blame ANYONE but themselves. There is nothing more obvious than Frank's guilt in this situation but will we hear that on MSLSD? I think not, instead you'll hear about the big bad Republicans causing it all. Despite the fact that this makes zero sense and has zero truth to it, Americans seem to eat it up. All I can say right now is Way to Go Bill !

I'm Drew. D. and that's the truth.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Why We Will Lose The Election and the Country

The old saying, "Nice Guys Finish Last," will embody the 2008 election. John Mccain being the "nice guy," has chosen to take the higher ground in an attempt to show us all that you can in fact become President being a stand up guy. While I fully respect his desire to bring honor and dignity to American politics I feel that the Chicago thug politics of Obama will unfortunately win out. Obama has zero dignity and zero honor, nothing is beneath this man or the Democratic party. Lying cheating and stealing are just the means that justify their ends.
The only way Democrats can ever win anything is by either cheating, lying or a combination of both. They know they can't run on facts because the truth contradicts everything they stand for. Obama does not stray from these practices. ACORN (The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is a "non-partisan" organization that promotes community agitation across the country. Did I say "non-partisan"? What I mean by non-partisan is that they are left wing wackos. That being said it came as no surprise to me that they are being accused of voter fraud in just about every swing state. I really admire their zeal, not caring whether or not someone is alive or dead or whether they exist at all in order to get registrations, that's true dedication to their job. It doesn't stop there, fraud fuels the Democrat machine. There is malpractice everywhere from ACORN's bogus voter registrations to Obama's "questionable" accounting practices.
These are just a few of the fraudulent cases that we know about. Just imagine how widespread this criminal empire that is the liberal machine actually is. If Mccain wants to win he is going to have to start defending himself. He is going to have to stop with all this "bi-partisan BS" and understand that Obama is the OPPONENT. When Obama rings off lie after lie after lie Mccain needs to be there to expose it, but he isn't. There were distinct bold faced lies littered throughout the first debate and Mccain passed on the meatballs. When Obama said "Nobody is saying the war is lost." Mccain should have said "BS! You DID!" When Obama said he is FOR drilling" Mccain should have said "BS! You AREN'T!" Instead Mccain stood there, and spoke about ear marks, trying to take that "high road" I suppose. I'm sorry but that won't work here Mr. Senator, I really wish it would, but it won't.
The main reason we will lose in November is because the American people seem to want this "change" Lord Obama preaches about. Apparently they are so dim witted to think that Bush is solely responsible for this current economic crisis. They seem to embrace this Socialist revolution that we face. They like the idea of universal mediocrity and misery. Perhaps are country needs to fall into a depression, perhaps we need to get attacked again. Maybe then they will see what these policies gain us. The sad part is I doubt they would admit it even then. Since Obama is infallible no matter what happens in his administration the blame will some how fall back on Bush or the Republicans. The sickness that is liberalism is spreading, People are too blind to see they are being infected with it everyday whether they like it or not. At a time I had more faith in my country, and in my people. For a time I had faith that capitalism was safe and would always win out. The tragic truth is that my country is dying, capitalism is dying, and the citizens are to blame for it all.
I'm Drew D. and that is the sad, scary, tragic, and infuriating truth.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Loving A Liberal

How can it be you might ask. How in the world could anyone love a liberal? As a man who is married to the "enemy" so to speak I will explain. My hope is to offer an analysis of this paradox that speaks to the skeptics and inspires those that are already part of one. To those of you involved in a Con/Lib relationship please know I fully understand all the hardships that you face at times. But as a man in the same position take it from me, it is worth the effort. To all the men in my boat I'm sure you know it can be very difficult. Especially if you hold your conservative values as close to your heart as I do. In fact I'm sure it has caused countless arguments between you and your significant other. In my case they would range from mild bickering to full blown insanity.

Why put up with all this you might ask. How could anyone who calls themselves conservative even be attracted to someone who has values we despise? Well to site a very cliche yet very accurate quote: "Love is Blind." In reality we do despise what the left represents, but if two people are meant for each other ideology loses priority. Let me be clear (so as to not anger my wife) I do not "despise" her beliefs. If I associated my hatred of liberals with my wife, well then she wouldn't be my wife. Truth is no matter what side your significant other is on you cherish them regardless.

Now as I mentioned earlier despite my love for my wife political arguments are inevitable. With my passion for the subject and my vehement opposition to some of her views it has gotten ugly at times. As a result she has often ended such arguments with " I don't want to talk about politics anymore." or "Let's not bring it up." The reality is that this is simply impossible. Politics surround us, they shape our culture, our economic systems, and our nation as a whole. Even with mild interest in the political arena it will come up. Our political viewpoints shape the way we look at the world and in a way mold us into who we are.

My wife and I have been together a long long time and we weren't going to let politics get in the way. Let me retract that statement, SHE wasn't going to let politics get in the way. That's right folks, yours truly, the man who has been espousing unwavering love for your partner regardless of politics was ALMOST a hypocrite. During this election season I have been particularly offended and angered by the left in their attempts to hijack the country I LOVE and the one they HATE. Through this rage I looked at my wife as the true enemy, the embodiment of all that was wrong in America. How can you support such a worm as Obama? I would ask her. How can you be OK electing a man that wants to completely destroy this nation? What pushed me over the edge was when I started finding out just how radical Obama really is. The Ayers/Rev. Wright connections disgusted and enraged me. The way I saw it was that anyone who did not denounce these men and their connections to Obama must APPROVE of their actions and beliefs. When I confronted my wife about these issues my rage blinded me. Her response was that of what I perceived to be indifference, which as you can understand made me lose it.

What I did not realize was that my wife truly did not understand what I was even saying to her. She had never seen the evidence and was quite frankly ignoring me. Due to constant brawls in the recent months she was trying to avoid conflict at all costs. As a result of this horrible miscommunication I was on the verge of ending it all. I couldn't bare the fact that I was married to a woman that had no moral objection to treasonous individuals that are directly tied to her candidate. During this political/ideological melt down she made me realize something that has changed our relationship forever. She reminded me that she is not at all as involved or as interested in the political arena as I am. However she still has her own set of values and beliefs but is OPEN to discussion. She admitted she never even saw the evidence about the Ayers/Wright connection, and once she did I was relieved.

The good woman I knew I married came through to me as she showed her utter contempt for what she saw. She could not believe that Obama would associate with such types and is highly skeptical of him now as a result. While left leaning she is an independent thinker who can be reasoned with. A trait far too many leftists do not share. As we made up I realized another crucial factor. She is not totally to blame for her some what misguided views on certain issues. Just like many Americans she trusts the media that lies to us everyday. She took MSLSD at their word and took every piece of propaganda to heart. With nothing to compare this nonsense to one can understand her situation. Without hearing the truth on a daily basis by someone besides me ranting at her she was lost. Now that she is reading my blog, and actually listening to the RIGHT side of the issues she is taking a turn for the best. She is slowly seeing the light, she is seeing the lie that is liberalism, the hypocrisy of the left. This inspires me to send this message to all you frustrated husbands and boyfriends. Do not throw away your soul mate over such issues even if they mean the world to you. Because as all of us conservatives know, if you can effectively illustrate the facts to someone they will almost always fair on our side.

TIPS On How to Educate not Alienate:

A big mistake I often made with my wife was that I came across very condescending. This was because I was very used to debating people of her ilk, and would inadvertently treat her the same way I did them. Which was by my admission a little condescending, but completely justified. It is NOT however justifiable to be that way towards your wife. It is not just wrong, it is ineffective. If you do this she will A. Get angry B. Not listen to you. and C. Think your wrong. To avoid this make sure you keep the conversation a conversation and not a lecture. Be sure to ask questions that get you both talking. Be sure to bring up facts that someone who is not politically savvy can easily grasp and understand. The more facts you state and more pleasant the conversation the more they will absorb and consider. Be sure to illustrate key differences between the schools of thought. This comparison minus the gross media bias will change their perspective quickly. If you are as lucky as I am and your woman is very bright they will eventually see the light.

I owe my wife everything, she knows me better than I know myself. She stands behind my crazy ass through thick and thin. To throw that away because she was simply misinformed would have been tragic. Thank god one of us thinks straight occasionally. This whole blog was her idea. Don't ever let it get that far guys, your partner might not be so understanding. Just consider what I have said here today, remember that if you truly love her she is worth the effort. It's a little more fun and interesting having someone that gives you a run for your money anyway. Inform them, discuss things with them, and you will find that it can be extremely rewarding.

I'm Drew D. and that's the truth.